FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155  
156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   >>   >|  
technical sense, was represented by no statue, and her title of Mater never suggested to the true Roman worshipper anything but her motherly grace and beneficence.[289] Far more than any other cult, that of Vesta represents the reality and continuity of Roman religious feeling; and the remains of her latest dwelling, and the statues of her priestesses with no statue of herself among them, may still give the visitor to the Forum some dim idea of the spirit of Roman worship.[290] NOTES TO LECTURE VI [219] Arnobius (v. 155) fortunately mentions that this story came from the second book of Valerius Antias, whose bad reputation is well known. It was plainly meant to account for the cult-title of Jupiter Elicius, and the origin of the _procuratio fulminis_, and was invented by Greeks or Graecising Romans at a time (2nd century B.C.) when all reverence for the gods had vanished as completely as in Greece. Yet Dr. Frazer writes of Numa as "an adept at bringing down lightning from heaven" (_Early History of Kingship_, p. 204). [220] On this subject, the evolution of the knowledge of God, I may refer to Professor Gwatkin's _Gifford Lectures_ of 1904-5, published by Messrs. T. & T. Clark, Edinburgh. [221] The meaning of _deus_ is well put by Mr. C. Bailey in his sketch of _Roman Religion_ (Constable & Co.), p. 12. [222] Guesses can be made about these, but little or nothing is to be learnt from them to help us in this lecture. [223] I adhere to what was said in _R.F._ p. 312 foll. We do not know, and probably never shall know, the original deity concerned in that festival. The ritual is wholly unlike that of the _rustica Faunalia_ (_R.F._ p. 256 foll.). I believe that it dates from a time anterior to the formation of real gods--possibly from an aboriginal people who did not know any. (I am glad to see this view taken in the latest summary of German learning on this subject, _Einleitung in die Altertumswissenschaft_, by Gaercke and Norden, vol. ii. p. 262.) At the moment of printing an interesting discussion of the Lupercalia, by Prof. Deubner, who treats it as a historical growth, in which are embodied ideas and rites of successive ages, has appeared in _Archiv_ (1910, p. 481 foll.). See Appendix B. [224] Wissowa, _R.K._ pp. 170 and 250 foll. [225] Strabo,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155  
156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
latest
 

statue

 
subject
 

original

 
ritual
 

wholly

 

unlike

 
festival
 

concerned

 

Religion


sketch
 

Constable

 

Bailey

 

meaning

 

Guesses

 
lecture
 

adhere

 
learnt
 
rustica
 

people


embodied

 

successive

 

growth

 

Lupercalia

 

discussion

 

Deubner

 

historical

 

treats

 

appeared

 

Strabo


Wissowa
 

Archiv

 

Appendix

 
interesting
 

printing

 

Edinburgh

 

aboriginal

 

possibly

 
anterior
 
formation

summary

 

Norden

 
moment
 

Gaercke

 

Altertumswissenschaft

 

learning

 

German

 

Einleitung

 

Faunalia

 

spirit