FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186  
187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   >>   >|  
Usener relied! [331] _Ges. Abhandl._ p. 304 foll. [332] Servius (Interpol.) _ad Georg._ i. 21. [333] Henzen, _Acta Fratr. Arv._ p. 147; _C.I.L._ vi. 2099 and 2107. [334] _Op. cit._ p. 323 foll.; for _famuli_ and _anculi divi_, Henzen, _op. cit._ p. 145. [335] See above, p. 121. [336] p. 312; cp. 320, where he further asserts his belief that Varro is responsible himself for the creation of a great number of these Sondergoetter, owing to his extreme desire to fix and define the function of every deity in relation to human life; just as the mediaeval writers Laskowski and Pretorius may have created many Lithuanian Sondergoetter. As I am not quite clear on this point, I have not mentioned it in the text. [337] _Op. cit._ p. 314, note 1. See above, note 33. [338] _e.g._ Vaticanus, "qui infantum vagitibus praesidet"; _Rusina_ from _rus_; _Consus_ from _consilium_, etc. [339] See above, p. 84. LECTURE VIII RITUAL OF THE _IUS DIVINUM_ I have already frequently mentioned the _ius divinum_, the law governing the relations between the divine and human inhabitants of the city, as the _ius civile_ governed the relations between citizen and citizen.[340] When we examined the calendar of Numa, we were in fact examining a part of this law; we began with this our studies of the religion of the Roman city-state, because it is the earliest document we possess which illuminates the dark ages of city life, so far as religion is concerned. The study of the calendar naturally led us on to consider the evidence it yields, taken together with other sources of information, as to the nature of the deities for whose worship it fixes times and seasons, or, more accurately, the amount of knowledge to which the Romans had attained about their divine beings. But we must now return to the _ius divinum_, and study it in another aspect, for which the calendar itself does not suffice as evidence. Perhaps the simplest way of explaining this _ius_ is to describe it as laying down the rules for the maintenance of right relations between the citizens and their deities; as ordaining what things are to be done or avoided in order to keep up a continual _pax_, or quasi-legal covenant, between these two parties. The two words _ius_ and _pax_, we may note, are continually meeting us in Roman religious documents. In a prayer sanctioned by the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186  
187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
relations
 

calendar

 
evidence
 

divinum

 
mentioned
 

deities

 

citizen

 
divine
 

Sondergoetter

 

Henzen


religion
 

examining

 

studies

 

yields

 

sources

 
examined
 

information

 
nature
 
naturally
 

illuminates


earliest

 

concerned

 

document

 

possess

 

Romans

 

avoided

 

things

 

maintenance

 

citizens

 

ordaining


continual
 

documents

 

prayer

 
sanctioned
 

religious

 

meeting

 

covenant

 

parties

 
continually
 
laying

knowledge

 

attained

 
beings
 

amount

 

accurately

 

worship

 

seasons

 

simplest

 

Perhaps

 

explaining