FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159  
160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   >>   >|  
iter, has omitted to notice that some theorisers fancied he was the _universe_, which by itself is enough to betray the delusive nature of this kind of theological speculation. Varro elsewhere gives us a clue to the liability of Janus to be exalted in this unnatural fashion, _L.L._ vii. 27, "divum deo" (in the Salian hymn), if this be taken as referring to Janus, as it may be, comparing Macrob. i. 9. 14. But this is easily explained by the position of Janus in prayers; cp. Cic. _Nat. Deor._ ii. 27. 67, "cum in omnibus rebus vim haberent maximam prima et extrema, principem in sacrificando Ianum esse voluerunt." The phrase "Deorum" or "Divum deus" is indeed remarkable, and unparalleled in Roman worship; but no one acquainted with Roman or Italian ritual will for a moment suspect it of meaning "God of gods" in either a Christian or metaphysical sense. I shall have occasion to notice the peculiar use of the genitive case and of genitival adjectives in worship later on. See below, p. 153 foll. [245] _Fasti_, i. 89 foll.; _R.F._ p. 281 foll. [246] Frazer, _l.c._ (a page of which every line appears to me to be written under a complete misapprehension of the right methods of research into the nature of Roman gods); A. B. Cook, _Classical Review_, vol. xviii. 367 foll.; Professor Ridgeway, _Who were the Romans?_ p. 12, where, among other remarkable statements, Janus is confidently said to have been introduced at Rome by the Sabine Numa, and therefore to have been a Sabine deity, an assumption quite irreconcilable with those of Dr. Frazer and Mr. Cook. In striking contrast with such speculations is a sensible paper on Janus in M. Toutain's _Etudes de mythologie et d'histoire_, p. 195 foll. (Paris, 1909). [247] Dr. Frazer is aware of this; see his _Kingship_, p. 285, note 1. See also Roscher in _Myth. Lex._, _s.v._ "Janus," p. 45 foll. [248] For the evidence for this and the following facts, see Roscher's article just cited, or Wissowa, _R.K._ p. 91 foll.; cp. _R.F._ p. 280 foll. The cult epithets of Janus are thus explained by von Domaszewski, _Abhandlungen_, p. 223, note 1, "Bei Ianus tritt regelmaessig der Begriff des Wesens hinzu, dessen Wirkung er von Anfang an bestimmt, so I. Consevius der Anfang der in Consus wirkenden Kraft, und in derselbe
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159  
160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Frazer
 

Sabine

 
Roscher
 

remarkable

 
worship
 

notice

 

Anfang

 
nature
 

explained

 

contrast


Toutain
 

theorisers

 

Etudes

 

irreconcilable

 

speculations

 
striking
 

Professor

 
Ridgeway
 
Romans
 

Classical


Review

 

assumption

 

introduced

 

statements

 

confidently

 

regelmaessig

 

Begriff

 

epithets

 

Domaszewski

 

Abhandlungen


Wesens
 

wirkenden

 

Consus

 
derselbe
 

Consevius

 

dessen

 

Wirkung

 

bestimmt

 
Kingship
 
research

histoire

 

Wissowa

 
article
 

evidence

 

mythologie

 

prayers

 

position

 

easily

 

Macrob

 

comparing