FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238  
239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   >>   >|  
re them, or within their competence; they merely decided the religious question--that unless there had been a _iussus populi_ or _plebis scitus_ there was no valid consecration.] [Footnote 388: Or perhaps only "statue of Liberty," as the temple was not yet completed.] [Footnote 389: A portico or colonnade, built by Q. Catulus, the conqueror of the Cimbri, on the site of the house of M. Flaccus, who was killed with Saturninus in B.C. 100. It was close to Cicero's house, and what Clodius appears to have done was to pull down the portico, and build another, extending over part of Cicero's site, on which was to be a temple for his statue of Liberty.] [Footnote 390: Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Marcellinus was called on first as consul designate for B.C. 56.] [Footnote 391: Sext. Attilius Serranus, a tribune. He had been a quaestor in Cicero's consulship, but had opposed his recall.] [Footnote 392: Cn. Oppius Cornicinus, the father-in-law of Serranus, is said in _p. red. at Quir._ Sec. 13 to have done the same in the senate on the 1st of January, when Serranus also went through the same form of "demanding a night" for consideration.] [Footnote 393: Prof. Tyrrell brackets _porticum_. But I do not understand his difficulty, especially as he saw none in the last letter. Cicero (_de Domo_, Sec. 102) certainly implies that Clodius had, at any rate, partly pulled down the _porticus Catuli_, in order to build something on a larger scale, which was to take in some of Cicero's site. This was now to come down, and so leave Cicero his _area_, and, I presume, the old _porticus Catuli_ was to be restored.] [Footnote 394: Cicero had given Crassus 3,500,000 for it (about L28,000). See Letter XVI.] [Footnote 395: _I.e._, my modest reserve. There does not seem any reason for Tyrrell's emendation of _num_ for _nam_.] [Footnote 396: I have translated Klotz's text. That given by Prof. Tyrrell is, to me at any rate, quite unintelligible. Cicero's _legatio_ under Pompey appears to have been, in fact, honorary, or _libera_, for he doesn't seem to have done anything. He wishes to reserve the right of resigning it to stand for the censorship (censors were elected in the following year), or of turning it into a _votiva legatio_, to visit certain sacred places on the plea of performing a vow, thus getting the opportunity, if he desired it, of retiring temporarily from Rome in a dignified manner. The force of _prope_ seems to be "almost a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238  
239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Cicero

 

Tyrrell

 

Serranus

 
legatio
 
appears
 

temple

 

Liberty

 

statue

 

reserve


Catuli

 

portico

 

Clodius

 

porticus

 

modest

 

manner

 

Letter

 
larger
 

pulled

 

implies


partly
 
presume
 

dignified

 

restored

 

Crassus

 

censorship

 

censors

 
resigning
 

opportunity

 

wishes


elected

 
performing
 

sacred

 
votiva
 

turning

 

libera

 
places
 
translated
 

reason

 

emendation


temporarily

 

desired

 

honorary

 

retiring

 

unintelligible

 

Pompey

 
Cimbri
 

Flaccus

 
killed
 

conqueror