FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141  
142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   >>   >|  
ircles of M and S, S in centre and separate circle of P] Conclusion I. All M is in P. Some S is in M. Some S is in P. [Illustration: Concentric circles of P and M, M in centre, both overlapped by circle of S] Conclusion O. No M is in P. Some S is in M. Some S is not in P. [Illustration: Circles of M and P touching, each overlapped by circle of S] These four forms constitute what are known as the moods of the First Figure of the Syllogism. Seeing that all propositions may be reduced to one or other of the four forms, A, E, I, or O, we have in these premisses abstract types of every possible valid argument from general principles. It is all the same whatever be the matter of the proposition. Whether the subject of debate is mathematical, physical, social or political, once premisses in these forms are conceded, the conclusion follows irresistibly, _ex vi formae, ex necessitate formae_. If an argument can be analysed into these forms, and you admit its propositions, you are bound in consistency to admit the conclusion--unless you are prepared to deny that if one thing is in another and that other in a third, the first is in the third, or if one thing is in another and that other wholly outside a third, the first is also outside the third. This is called the AXIOM OF SYLLOGISM. The most common form of it in Logic is that known as the _Dictum_, or _Regula de Omni et Nullo:_ "Whatever is predicated of All or None of a term, is predicated of whatever is contained in that term". It has been expressed with many little variations, and there has been a good deal of discussion as to the best way of expressing it, the relativity of the word best being often left out of sight. _Best_ for what purpose? Practically that form is the best which best commands general assent, and for this purpose there is little to choose between various ways of expressing it. To make it easy and obvious it is perhaps best to have two separate forms, one for affirmative conclusions and one for negative. Thus: "Whatever is affirmed of all M, is affirmed of whatever is contained in M: and whatever is denied of all M, is denied of whatever is contained in M". The only advantage of including the two forms in one expression, is compendious neatness. "A part of a part is a part of the whole," is a neat form, it being understood that an individual or a species is part of a genus. "What is said of a whole, is said of e
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141  
142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

circle

 

contained

 
argument
 

Conclusion

 

general

 

premisses

 

separate

 
conclusion
 

purpose

 

formae


expressing

 

centre

 

Whatever

 
predicated
 
overlapped
 

affirmed

 

denied

 
propositions
 

Illustration

 

relativity


variations
 

expressed

 
discussion
 

advantage

 

including

 

expression

 

affirmative

 

conclusions

 

negative

 
compendious

neatness

 

species

 

individual

 
understood
 

obvious

 
Practically
 
commands
 

assent

 

choose

 
abstract

reduced

 
Whether
 
subject
 

proposition

 

matter

 

principles

 

Seeing

 
Circles
 
circles
 

ircles