FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284  
285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   >>   >|  
red.... I think the thing to do is to put a ceiling over the number you take in, and then take the best ones."[7-49] [Footnote 7-48: Pittsburgh _Post Gazette_, December 19, 1946.] [Footnote 7-49: Memo, D/PRD for SW, ASW, and D/P&A, 19 Dec 46, ASW 291.2.] The suit brought to a climax the feeling of indignation against Army policy that had been growing among some civil rights activists. One organization called on the Secretary of War to abandon the Gillem Board policy "and unequivocably and equitably integrate Negroes ... without any discrimination, segregation or quotas in any form, concept or manner."[7-50] Senator Robert M. LaFollette, Jr., of Wisconsin called the decision to suspend black enlistments race discrimination.[7-51] Walter P. Reuther, president of the United Automobile Workers and the codirector of his union's Fair Practices Department, branded the establishment of a quota "undemocratic and in violation of principles for which they [Negroes] fought in the war" and demanded that black enlistment be reinstated and the quota abolished.[7-52] Invoking American tradition and the United Nations Charter, John Haynes Holmes, chairman of the board of directors of the American Civil Liberties Union, called for the abolition of enlistment quotas. The national commander of the United Negro and Allied Veterans of America announced that his organization unreservedly condemned the quota because it deliberately deprived citizens of their constitutional right to serve their country.[7-53] [Footnote 7-50: Ltr, American Veterans Committee, Manhattan Chapter, to SW, 17 Jul 46, SW 291.2 (NT).] [Footnote 7-51: Ltr, LaFollette to SW, 25 Jul 46, SW 291.2.] [Footnote 7-52: Ltr, Reuther and William Oliver to SW, 23 Jul 46, SW 291.2.] [Footnote 7-53: Ltr, J. H. Holmes to SW, 26 Jul 46; Ltr, Arthur D. Gatz, Nat'l Cmdr, United Negro and Allied Veterans of America, to SW, 20 Jul 46; both in SW 291.2.] The replies of the Secretary of War to all these protests were very much alike. The Army's enlistment practices, he wrote, were based on a belief that black strength in the Army ought to bear a direct relationship to the percentage of Negroe
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284  
285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

United

 
Veterans
 

enlistment

 
called
 

American

 

organization

 
Secretary
 

policy

 

Allied


Reuther
 

America

 

Negroes

 

discrimination

 

quotas

 
Holmes
 

LaFollette

 
deliberately
 
citizens
 

deprived


constitutional

 

commander

 

Haynes

 

chairman

 

Charter

 

Invoking

 

tradition

 

Nations

 

directors

 

announced


unreservedly
 

condemned

 

national

 
abolition
 

Liberties

 

Manhattan

 

practices

 

protests

 
replies
 
direct

relationship

 

percentage

 
Negroe
 

belief

 

strength

 

Chapter

 

abolished

 

Committee

 

country

 

William