FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132  
133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   >>   >|  
it devours animal and mineral substances indiscriminately, until its enormous stomach is completely full. It swallows without any choice, and merely as it were to serve for ballast, wood, stones, grass, iron, copper, gold, lime, or, in fact, any other substance equally hard, indigestible, and deleterious." Sir Thomas Browne,[277] writing on this subject, says, "The ground of this conceit in its swallowing down fragments of iron, which men observing, by a forward illation, have therefore conceived it digesteth them, which is an inference not to be admitted, as being a fallacy of the consequent." In Loudon's "Magazine of Natural History" (No. 6, p. 32) we are told of an ostrich having been killed by swallowing glass. [274] Called _estridge_ in "1 Henry IV." iv. 1. [275] See Brand's "Pop. Antiq.," 1849, vol. iii. p. 365. [276] "Animal Kingdom," 1829, vol. viii. p. 427. [277] See Sir Thomas Browne's Works, 1852, vol. i. pp. 334-337. _Owl._ The dread attached to this unfortunate bird is frequently spoken of by Shakespeare, who has alluded to several of the superstitions associated with it. At the outset, many of the epithets ascribed to it show the prejudice with which it was regarded--being in various places stigmatized as "the vile owl," in "Troilus and Cressida" (ii. I); and the "obscure bird," in "Macbeth" (ii. 3), etc. From the earliest period it has been considered a bird of ill-omen, and Pliny tells us how, on one occasion, even Rome itself underwent a lustration, because one of them strayed into the Capitol. He represents it also as a funereal bird, a monster of the night, the very abomination of human kind. Vergil[278] describes its death-howl from the top of the temple by night, a circumstance introduced as a precursor of Dido's death. Ovid,[279] too, constantly speaks of this bird's presence as an evil omen; and indeed the same notions respecting it may be found among the writings of most of the ancient poets. This superstitious awe in which the owl is held may be owing to its peculiar look, its occasional and uncertain appearance, its loud and dismal cry,[280] as well as to its being the bird of night.[281] It has generally been associated with calamities and deeds of darkness.[282] Thus, its weird shriek pierces the ear of Lady Macbeth (ii. 2), while the murder is being committed: "Hark!--Peace! It was the owl that shriek'd, the fatal bellman, Wh
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132  
133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

swallowing

 

Browne

 

Macbeth

 

Thomas

 

shriek

 

represents

 

funereal

 

Capitol

 
underwent
 

lustration


strayed
 

monster

 

describes

 
committed
 

Vergil

 
abomination
 
stomach
 

occasion

 

obscure

 

bellman


completely

 

Cressida

 
Troilus
 

earliest

 
period
 

considered

 

temple

 

appearance

 
dismal
 

uncertain


occasional

 

peculiar

 

pierces

 

darkness

 

generally

 

calamities

 

superstitious

 

constantly

 
stigmatized
 
speaks

presence

 

circumstance

 

introduced

 

precursor

 

writings

 

ancient

 

notions

 

respecting

 

murder

 

inference