FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60  
61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   >>   >|  
ne, Anjou, Poitiers, the Isle of France, and the Orleannois, was Keltic, has never been doubted. The evidence of Caesar is express; and there is neither objection nor cavil to set against it. There it is, where, at the present moment, the Keltic Breton of Brittany continues to be the language of the common people. The central and south-eastern parts of France--the Nivernois, Burgundy, the Bourbonnois, the Lionnois, Auvergne, Dauphiny, Languedoc, Savoy, and Provence--were _chiefly_ Keltic. Perhaps they were wholly so; but as the Ligurians of Italy, and Iberians of Spain are expressly stated to have met on the lower Rhone, it is best to qualify this assertion. At the same time, good reasons can be given for considering that the Ligurians were but little different from the other Gauls. South of the Garonne the ancient population was _Iberic_. Switzerland, or the ancient Helvetia, was Keltic, and beyond Switzerland, along the banks of the Danube, and in the fertile plains of Northern Italy, intrusive and conquering Kelts were extended as far east as Styria, and as far south as Etruria; but these were offsets from the main body of the stock, whose true area was Gaul and the British isles. The parts between the Seine and Rhine, the valleys of the Marne, the Oise, the Somme, the Sambre, the Meuse, and the Moselle were _Belgic_. Treves was Belgian; Luxembourg, Belgian; the Netherlands, Belgian. Above all, French Flanders, Artois, and Picardy--the parts nearest Britain--the parts within sight of Kent--the parts from whence Britain was most likely to be peopled--were Belgian. Now, as Britain was originally Keltic, unless Belgium be Keltic also, we shall meet with a difficulty. In my own mind Belgium _was_ originally Keltic; and, perhaps, nine ethnologists out of ten hold the same opinion. At the same time, fair reasons can be given for an opposite doctrine, fair reasons for believing the _Belgae_ to have been German--as German as the Angles of old, as German as the present Germans of Germany, as German as the Dutch of Holland, and, what is more to the purpose, as German as the present Flemings of Flanders, possibly occupants of the ancient, and certainly occupants of the modern, Belgium. Upon the latter fact we must lay considerable weight. Modern Belgium is as truly the country of two languages and of a double population as Wales, Ireland, or Scotland. There is the French, which has extended itself from the south,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60  
61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Keltic

 

German

 
Belgium
 

Belgian

 

reasons

 

Britain

 

ancient

 

present

 

Flanders

 

French


extended
 

originally

 

Switzerland

 

population

 

Ligurians

 

occupants

 

France

 

double

 

valleys

 

languages


country

 

peopled

 

nearest

 

Picardy

 

Treves

 

Luxembourg

 

Belgic

 

Moselle

 

Sambre

 
Scotland

Ireland

 
Artois
 

Netherlands

 

weight

 

Flemings

 

purpose

 

opposite

 

opinion

 

possibly

 

doctrine


believing

 

Germany

 

Germans

 

Belgae

 

Angles

 

Holland

 

considerable

 
difficulty
 

ethnologists

 

modern