FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   >>  
w, the principal function of the House of Commons nowadays is to provide amusing "copy" for the late editions of the evening papers and to give the "sketch"-writers a chance of exercising their pretty wits. As Mr. SPENCER LEIGH HUGHES once remarked in an after-dinner speech to Mr. BALFOUR, "You, Sir, are our raw material." Now, what I complain of is that on the present occasion the voters have entirely disregarded the needs of the journeymen of the Press, and have ruthlessly deprived them of the greater part of their raw material. Mr. HUGHES himself, I am glad to see, has been spared, but he fortunately had not to undergo the hazards of a contest. I tremble to think what his fate might have been if at the last moment some stodgy statesman had been nominated to oppose him. Against humour, conscious or unconscious, the voters seem to have solidly set their faces. It was bad enough that Mr. JOE KING--who has probably helped to provide more deserving journalists with a living than any other legislator who ever lived--should have declined the contest. Question-time without Mr. KING and his unerring nose for mare's-nests will be like _Alice_ without _The Mad Hatter_. It was bad, too, that Sir HEDWORTH MEUX should have decided to interrupt the flow of that eloquence which we were forbidden to call "breezy," and that Major "Boadicea" HUNT, Mr. JOHN BURNS, Mr. TIM HEALY, and Mr. SWIFT MACNEILL should have withdrawn from a scene in which they had provided so much profitable entertainment for the gods in the Press Gallery. These losses made it all the more incumbent upon the electors to see that the House should retain as much as possible of the remnant of its comic relief. But what do we find? Why, that practically every one of the gentlemen who made the journalist's life worth living in the last Parliament has been cruelly turned down. For much of this grief the Sinn Feiners are responsible. They have easily accomplished what a few years ago six stalwart British constables could scarcely do and have removed the gigantic Mr. FLAVIN from his emerald bench. With him have gone nearly all his comrades; and the once-powerful Nationalist party, which for nearly forty years has been such an unfailing source of sparkling paragraphs, is reduced to the number immortalised by WORDSWORTH'S little maid. Almost more distressing than the loss of individuals is the breaking up of Parliamentary partnerships. What is the use of Mr. HOUS
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   >>  



Top keywords:
material
 

voters

 

contest

 
living
 

HUGHES

 
provide
 

Boadicea

 

remnant

 

gentlemen

 

practically


breezy

 
relief
 

MACNEILL

 

entertainment

 

profitable

 

losses

 

journalist

 

Gallery

 

provided

 
incumbent

withdrawn

 

retain

 
electors
 

easily

 

paragraphs

 

sparkling

 

reduced

 
number
 

immortalised

 
source

unfailing

 

Nationalist

 

powerful

 

WORDSWORTH

 
Parliamentary
 

partnerships

 

breaking

 
individuals
 

Almost

 

distressing


comrades

 
Feiners
 

responsible

 

forbidden

 

Parliament

 

cruelly

 

turned

 

accomplished

 

gigantic

 

removed