rdinals, etc. Compare David's _Hibbert Lectures_, p. 193.]
[Footnote 26: The literature on this subject is very
extensive (see the Bibliography). On Buddhism and
Christianity see Bohlen's _Altes Indien_, I. 334 (Weber,
_Indische Skizzen_, p. 92). At a recent meeting of the
British Association E.B. Tylor presented a paper in which is
made an attempt to show Buddhistic influence on
pre-Columbian culture in America. On comparing the Aztec
picture-writing account of the journey of the soul after
death with Buddhistic eschatology, he is forced to the
conclusion that there was direct transmission from Buddhism.
We require more proof than Aztec pictures of hell to believe
any such theory; and reckon this attempt to those already
discussed in the eighth chapter.]
[Footnote 27: It is a mooted question in how far the
influence in this line has been reciprocal. See _Indische
Studien_, iii. 128.]
[Footnote 28: The S[=a]nkhya has no systematic connection
with the 'numbers' of Pythagoras.]
[Footnote 29: Compare on the Culvas[=u]tras, Thibaut, J.A.
Beng. xliv. p. 227; Von Schroeder, _Pythagoras und die
Inder; Literatur und Cultur_, p. 718 ff, who also cites
Cantor, _Geschichte der Mathematik_, p. 540, and refutes the
possibility, suggested by the latter, of the loan being from
Greece to India on the ground that the Culvas[=u]tra are too
old to belong to the Alexandrine period, and too essentlal a
part of the religious literature to have been borrowed; and
also on the ground that they are not an addition to the
Cr[=a]utas[=u]tra, but they make an independent portion (p.
721, note).]
[Footnote 30: Compare Garbe (_loc. cit_. below), and his
_S[=a][.m]khya Philosophic_, p. 94.]
[Footnote 31: This view is not one universally accepted by
Sanskrit scholars. See, for instance, Weber, _Die Griechen
in Indien_. But to us the minute resemblance appears too
striking to be accidental.]
[Footnote 32: Lassen, and Weber, _Indische Skizzen, p_. 91.]
[Footnote 33: Garbe, in a recent number of the _Monist_,
where is given a _resume_ of the relations between Greek and
Hindu philosophical thought.]
[Footnote 34: Weber, _loc. cit._]
[Footnote 35: The existence of a soul (spirit) in man is
always assumed in the Upanishads. In
|