FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381  
382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   >>   >|  
s_. In 1215 the same prohibition was repeated, specifying the _Metaphysics_ and _Physics_, and the _Commentaries_ by the Spaniard Mauritius (i.e. probably Averroes). Meanwhile Albertus Magnus and Thomas Aquinas, accepting the exegetical services of the Arabians, did their best to controvert the obnoxious doctrine of the Intellect, and to defend the orthodoxy of Aristotle against the unholy glosses of infidels. But it is doubtful whether even they kept as pure from the infection of illegitimate doctrine as they supposed. The tide meanwhile flowed in stronger and stronger. In 1270 Etienne Tempier, bishop of Paris, supported by an assembly of theologians, anathematized thirteen propositions bearing the stamp of Arabian authorship; but in 1277 the same views and others more directly offensive to Christians and theologians had to be censured again. Raymond Lully, in a dialogue with an infidel thinker, broke a lance in support of the orthodox doctrine, and carried on a crusade against the Arabians in every university; and a disciple of Thomas Aquinas drew up a list (_De erroribus philosophorum_) of the several delusions and errors of each of the thinkers from Kindi to Averroes. Strong in their conviction of the truth of Aristotelianism, the Arabians carried out their logical results in the theological field, and made the distinction of necessary and possible, of form and matter, the basis of conclusions in the most momentous questions. They refused to accept the doctrine of creation because it conflicted with the explanation of forms as the necessary evolution of matter. They denied the particular providence of God, because knowledge in the divine sphere did not descend to singulars. They excluded the Deity from all direct action upon the world, and substituted for a cosmic principle the active intellect,--thus holding a form of Pantheism. But all did not go the same length in their divergence from the popular creed. The half-legendary accounts which attribute the introduction of Arabian science to Gerbert, afterwards Pope Sylvester II., to Constantinus Africanus and to Adelard of Bath, if they have any value, refer mainly to medical science and mathematics. It was not till about the middle of the 12th century that under the patronage of Raymond, archbishop of Toledo, a society of translators, with the archdeacon Dominicus Gundisalvi at their head, produced Latin versions of the _Commentaries_ of Avicenna, and Ghazali, of the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381  
382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

doctrine

 

Arabians

 
stronger
 

science

 
carried
 

Raymond

 

Arabian

 

Commentaries

 

theologians

 

matter


Averroes

 
Thomas
 

Aquinas

 

holding

 
Pantheism
 
substituted
 
cosmic
 

direct

 

action

 
active

intellect
 

principle

 

knowledge

 

questions

 
momentous
 
refused
 

accept

 

creation

 

conclusions

 

distinction


conflicted
 

explanation

 

divine

 

sphere

 

descend

 

singulars

 

providence

 

evolution

 

denied

 
excluded

introduction

 
century
 
patronage
 

Ghazali

 

middle

 
mathematics
 

archbishop

 
Toledo
 

Avicenna

 
produced