FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429  
430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   >>   >|  
ool. Soc._ VOL. xi., 1883. d, Chelicera. ch, Chela. cam_, Camerostome. m, Mouth. ent_, Entosternum. p, Pecten. stig^1, First pulmonary aperture. stig^4, Fourth pulmonary aperture. dam, Muscle from carapace to a praeoral entosclerite. ad, Muscle from carapace to entosternum. md, Muscle from tergite of genital somite to entosternum (same as dpm in fig. 30). dv^1 to dv^6, Dorso-ventral muscles (same as the series labelled tsm in fig. 30). pv^1 to pv^7, The seven veno-pericardiac muscles of the right side (labelled VPM in fig. 30).] [Illustration: FIG. 32.--Diagram of a lateral view of a longitudinal section of Limulus. After Benham, _Trans Zool. Soc._ vol. xi, 1883. Suc, Suctorial pharynx. al, Alimentary canal. Ph, Pharynx. M, Mouth. Est, Entosternum. VS, Ventral venous sinus. chi, Chilaria. go, Genital operculum. br^1 to br^5, Branchial appendages, met, Unsegmented metasoma. Entap^4, Fourth dorsal entapophysis of left side. tsm, Tergo-sternal muscles, six pairs as in Scorpio (labelled dv in fig. 31). VPM^1 to VPM^8, The eight pairs of veno-pericardiac muscles (labelled pv in fig. 31). VPM^1 is probably represented in Scorpio, though not marked in figs. 30 and 31.] Leaving that question for consideration in connexion with the systematic statement of the characters of the various groups of Arachnida which follows on p. 299, it is well now to consider the following question, viz., seeing that Limulus and Scorpio are such highly developed and specialized forms, and that they seem to constitute as it were the first and second steps in the series of recognized Arachnida--what do we know, or what are we led to suppose with regard to the more primitive Arachnida from which the Eurypterines and Limulus and Scorpio have sprung? Do we know in the recent or fossil condition any such primitive Arachnids? Such a question is not only legitimate, but prompted by the analogy of at least one other great class of Arthropods. The great Arthropod class, the Crustacea, presents to the zoologist at the present day an immense range of forms, comprising the primitive phyllopods, the minute copepods, the parasitic cirrhipedes and the powerful crabs and lobsters, and the highly elaborated sand-hoppers and slaters. It has been insisted, by those who accepted Lankester's original doctrine of the direct or genetic affinity of the Chaetopoda and Arthrop
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429  
430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

labelled

 

Scorpio

 
muscles
 

Muscle

 
primitive
 

question

 

Limulus

 

Arachnida

 

pericardiac

 

series


highly

 
pulmonary
 

Entosternum

 

Fourth

 
aperture
 
carapace
 
entosternum
 

suppose

 

recent

 
fossil

Eurypterines
 

sprung

 

regard

 

developed

 
specialized
 
recognized
 

condition

 

constitute

 

slaters

 

insisted


hoppers
 

powerful

 

lobsters

 

elaborated

 

genetic

 

affinity

 

Chaetopoda

 

Arthrop

 

direct

 
doctrine

accepted

 
Lankester
 
original
 

cirrhipedes

 

parasitic

 
analogy
 

Arthropods

 
prompted
 

Arachnids

 
legitimate