FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428  
429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   >>   >|  
the fact that they differ little from any average feather of birds in general, mark the contour feather as primitively simple, and as the starting-point from which the highly elaborated eye-painted tail feather has gradually evolved. Applying these principles to the consideration of the Arachnida, we arrive at the conclusion that the smaller and simpler Arachnids are not the more primitive, but that the Acari or mites are, in fact, a degenerate group. This was maintained by Lankester in 1878 (19), again in 1881 (20); it was subsequently announced as a novelty by Claus in 1885 (21). Though the aquatic members of a class of animals are in some instances derived from terrestrial forms, the usual transition is from an aquatic ancestry to more recent land-living forms. There is no doubt, from a consideration of the facts of structure, that the aquatic water-breathing Arachnids, represented in the past by the Eurypterines and to-day by the sole survivor Limulus, have preceded the terrestrial air-breathing forms of that group. Hence we see at once that the better-known Arachnida form a series, leading from Limulus-like aquatic creatures through scorpions, spiders and harvest-men, to the degenerate Acari or mites. The spiders are specialized and reduced in apparent complexity, as compared with the scorpions, but they cannot be regarded as degenerate since the concentration of structure which occurs in them results in greater efficiency and power than are exhibited by the scorpion. The determination of the relative degree of perfection of organization attained by two animals compared is difficult when we introduce, as seems inevitable, the question of efficiency and power, and do not confine the question to the perfection of morphological development. We have no measure of the degree of power manifested by various animals--though it would be possible to arrive at some conclusions as to how that "power" should be estimated. It is not possible here to discuss that matter further. We must be content to point out that it seems that the spiders, the pedipalps, and other large Arachnids have not been derived from the scorpions directly, but have independently developed from aquatic ancestors, and from one of these independent groups--probably through the harvest-men from the spiders--the Acari have finally resulted. [Illustration: FIG. 31.--Diagram of a lateral view of a longitudinal section of a scorpion. After Beck, _Trans. Z
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428  
429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

aquatic

 

spiders

 
degenerate
 

animals

 
Arachnids
 

scorpions

 

feather

 

Limulus

 

degree

 

structure


breathing

 
question
 

perfection

 

harvest

 
compared
 
arrive
 
terrestrial
 

derived

 

scorpion

 
consideration

efficiency
 

Arachnida

 

introduce

 

morphological

 
confine
 
inevitable
 

development

 

determination

 

occurs

 

results


concentration
 

regarded

 

greater

 

difficult

 

attained

 

organization

 

exhibited

 

relative

 

matter

 
finally

resulted

 
Illustration
 
groups
 

independent

 

developed

 
ancestors
 

section

 
longitudinal
 

Diagram

 
lateral