FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432  
433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   >>   >|  
obation of the head and body--due to the expansion and flattening of the sides or "pleura" of the tegumentary skeleton--is so closely repeated in the young of Limulus that the latter has been called "the trilobite stage" of Limulus (fig. 42 compared with fig. 41). No Crustacean exhibits this trilobite form. But most important of the evidences presented by the trilobites of affinity with Limulus, and therefore with the Arachnida, is the tendency less marked in some, strongly carried out in others, to form a pygidial or telsonic shield--a fusion of the posterior somites of the body, which is precisely identical in character with the metasomatic carapace of Limulus. When to this is added the fact that a post-anal spine is developed to a large size in some trilobites (fig. 38), like that of Limulus and Scorpio, and that lateral spines on the pleura of the somites are frequent as in Limulus, and that neither metasomatic fusion of somites nor post-anal spine, nor lateral pleural spines are found in any Crustacean, nor all three together in any Arthropod besides the trilobites and Limulus--the claim of the trilobites to be considered as representing one order of a lower grade of Arachnida, comparable to the grade Entomostraca of the Crustacea, seems to be established. The fact that the single pair of prae-oral appendages of trilobites, known only as yet in one genus, is in that particular case a pair of uni-ramose antennae--does not render the association of trilobites and Arachnids improbable. Although the prae-oral pair of appendages in the higher Arachnida is usually chelate, it is not always so; in spiders it is not so; nor in many Acari. The bi-ramose structure of the post-oral limbs, demonstrated by Beecher in the trilobite Triarthrus, is no more inconsistent with its claim to be a primitive Arachnid than is the foliaceous modification of the limbs in Phyllopods inconsistent with their relationship to the Arthrostracous Crustaceans such as Gammarus and Oniscus. Thus, then, it seems that we have in the trilobites the representatives of the lower phases of the Arachnidan pedigree. The simple anomomeristic trilobite, with its equi-formal somites and equi-formal appendages, is one term of the series which ends in the even more simple but degenerate Acari. Between the two and at the highest point of the arc, so far as morphological differentiation is concerned, stands the scorpion; near to it in the trilobite's direction (
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432  
433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Limulus

 

trilobites

 
trilobite
 

somites

 
Arachnida
 

appendages

 

lateral

 

spines

 

metasomatic

 

fusion


simple

 
pleura
 

inconsistent

 

Crustacean

 
formal
 
ramose
 
render
 

Beecher

 

antennae

 
Triarthrus

Although
 

spiders

 

chelate

 

structure

 
Arachnids
 
demonstrated
 

improbable

 

higher

 

association

 

Crustaceans


Between
 

highest

 

degenerate

 

series

 

scorpion

 

direction

 

stands

 

concerned

 

morphological

 
differentiation

anomomeristic

 
relationship
 
Arthrostracous
 

Phyllopods

 

modification

 
Arachnid
 

foliaceous

 
Gammarus
 

representatives

 
phases