FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437  
438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   >>   >|  
ondary processes. (After Beecher, from Zittel.) ] On the other hand, it may well be doubted whether the pygidial or posterior carapace is primarily due to a fusion of the tergites of somites which were previously movable and well developed. The posterior carapace of the Trilobites and of _Limulus_ is probably enough in origin a telsonic carapace--that is to say, is the tergum of the last segment of the body which carries the anus. From the front of this region new segments are produced in the first instance, and are added during growth to the existing series. This telson may enlarge, it may possibly even become internally and sternally developed as partially separate somites, and the tergum may remain without trace of somite formation, or, as appears to be the case in _Limulus_, the telson gives rise to a few well-marked somites (mesosoma and two others) and then enlarges without further trace of segmentation, whilst the chitinous integument which develops in increasing thickness on the terga as growth advances welds together the unsegmented telson and the somites in front of it, which were previously marked by separate tergal thickenings. It must always be remembered that we are liable (especially in the case of fossilized integuments) to attach an unwarranted interpretation to the mere discontinuity or continuity of the thickened plates of chitinous cuticle on the back of an Arthropod. These plates may fuse, and yet the somites to which they belong may remain distinct, and each have its pair of appendages well developed. On the other hand, an unusually large tergal plate, whether terminal or in the series, is not always due to fusion of the dorsal plates of once-separate somites, but is often a case of growth and enlargement of a single somite without formation of any trace of a new somite. For the literature of Trilobites see (22*). [Illustration: FIG. 35.--_Triarthrus Becki_, Green. a, Restored thoracic limbs in transverse section of the animal; b, section across a posterior somite; c, section across one of the sub-terminal somites. (After Beecher.)] [Illustration: FIG. 36.--_Triarthrus Becki_, Green. Dorsal view of second thoracic leg with and without setae. en, Inner ramus; ex, Outer ramus. (After Beecher.)] [Illustration: FIG. 37.--_Deiphon Forbesii_, Barr. One of the Cheiruridae. Silurian Bohemia. (From Zittel's Palae
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437  
438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

somites

 

somite

 
growth
 

developed

 
telson
 

section

 

separate

 

carapace

 

Illustration

 

Beecher


plates

 
posterior
 

terminal

 

marked

 
remain
 
tergal
 
Triarthrus
 

chitinous

 

series

 
formation

thoracic
 

previously

 

Limulus

 

Trilobites

 
fusion
 
Zittel
 

tergum

 

single

 

thickened

 

Arthropod


cuticle
 

enlargement

 

unusually

 

distinct

 

appendages

 

dorsal

 

belong

 

Deiphon

 

Forbesii

 
Bohemia

Silurian

 
Cheiruridae
 
transverse
 

animal

 

Restored

 
continuity
 

Dorsal

 
literature
 

integument

 
instance