FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420  
421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   >>   >|  
enoist, a Proportional Representation League by which there has been carried on in recent years a very vigorous and promising propaganda. The principal arguments employed by the advocates of the proposed reform are (1) that the effect of its adoption would be greatly to increase the aggregate vote cast in parliamentary elections, since electors belonging to minority parties would be assured of actual representation; (2) that it would no longer be possible, as is now regularly the case, for the number of voters unrepresented by deputies of their own political faith to be in excess of the number of electors so represented;[483] and (3) that a parliament in which the various parties are represented in proportion to their voting strength can be depended upon to know and to execute the will of the nation with more precision than can a legislative body elected after the principle of the majority system.[484] [Footnote 482: The first English-speaking state to adopt the system was Tasmania, where, after being in partial operation in 1896-1901, it was brought fully into effect in 1907. By an electoral law of 1900 Japan adopted it for the election of the members of her House of Commons. The plan was put in operation in Cuba April 1, 1908, and was adopted in Oregon by a referendum of June 1, 1908.] [Footnote 483: It is the assertion of M. Benoist that this situation has existed unbrokenly since 1881. An interesting fact cited is that the notable Separation Law of 1905 was adopted in the Chamber by the votes of 341 deputies who represented in the aggregate but 2,647,315 electors in a national total of 10,967,000.] [Footnote 484: Duguit, _op. cit._, argues forcefully in behalf of the proposed change. For adverse views, cogently stated by an equally eminent French authority, see A. Esmein, Droit Constitutionnel (5th ed., Paris, 1911), 253.] *349. The Government and Reform.*--During upwards of a decade the successive ministries of France have been committed to the cause of electoral reform. In March, 1907, a special committee of the Chamber of Deputies
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420  
421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

represented

 

adopted

 

electors

 
Footnote
 

Chamber

 

number

 

effect

 

deputies

 

parties

 
system

aggregate

 
operation
 
electoral
 

proposed

 
reform
 

notable

 

Separation

 

members

 
Commons
 
situation

existed

 
Benoist
 

assertion

 

national

 
referendum
 

Oregon

 

interesting

 
unbrokenly
 

change

 

Government


Reform

 

During

 

upwards

 

decade

 

successive

 

special

 

committee

 

Deputies

 

ministries

 

France


committed

 

Constitutionnel

 
argues
 

forcefully

 

behalf

 

election

 

Duguit

 
adverse
 

authority

 

Esmein