FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61  
62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   >>   >|  
of the enemy's, and there to engage with them." The precise force of "steer with" is not immediately apparent to us to-day, nor does it seem to have been perfectly clear then; for the question was put to the captain of the flag-ship,--the heroic Gardiner, --"You have been asked if the admiral did not express some uneasiness at Captain Andrews"--of the van ship in the action--"not seeming to understand the 19th Article of the Fighting Instructions; Do not you understand that article to relate to our van particularly when the two fleets are [already] in a parallel line of battle to each other?" (As TT, F3). _Answer_: "I apprehended it in the situation" [not parallel] "we were in[1] if the word _For_ were instead of the word _With_, he would, I apprehend, have steered directly _for_ the van ship of the Enemy." _Question_. "As the 19th Article expresses to steer with the van of the enemy, if the leading ship had done so, in the oblique line we were in with the enemy, and every ship had observed it the same, would it not have prevented our rear coming to action at all, at least within a proper distance?" _Answer_: "Rear, and van too." "Steer with" therefore meant, to the Court and to Gardiner, to steer parallel to the enemy,--possibly likewise abreast,--and if the fleets were already parallel the instruction would work; but neither the articles themselves, nor Byng by his signals, did anything to effect parallelism before making the signal to engage. The captain of the ship sternmost in passing, which became the van when the fleet tacked together according to the Instructions and signals, evidently shared Gardiner's impression; when about, he steered parallel to--"with"--the French, who had the wind nearly abeam. The mischief was that the ships ahead of him in passing were successively more and more distant from the enemy, and if they too, after tacking, steered with the latter, they would never get any nearer. The _impasse_ is clear. Other measures doubtless would enable an admiral to range his fleet parallel to the enemy at any chosen distance, by taking a position himself and forming the fleet on his ship; or, in this particular instance, Byng being with the van as it, on the starboard tack, was passing the enemy (B3 B3), could at any moment have brought his fleet parallel to the French by signalling the then van ship to keep away a certain amount, the rest following in her wake. Nothing to that effect being in the Instr
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61  
62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

parallel

 
Gardiner
 

steered

 
passing
 

action

 

understand

 
fleets
 

Article

 

distance

 

Answer


French

 
Instructions
 

signals

 

effect

 

engage

 

captain

 

admiral

 
mischief
 

successively

 

distant


sternmost

 

signal

 

making

 

parallelism

 

tacked

 
impression
 
evidently
 

shared

 
chosen
 

moment


brought
 

signalling

 

instance

 

starboard

 
Nothing
 

amount

 

impasse

 

measures

 
nearer
 

tacking


doubtless

 
enable
 

forming

 

position

 

taking

 
oblique
 

article

 
Fighting
 

uneasiness

 

Captain