FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53  
54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   >>   >|  
division led on the other tack, they, as headmost ships of the fleet, would be ready to chase. Nevertheless, when the admiral sent to Lestock in the forenoon to hurry him into line, no order was given to these ships to press ahead. Why? Lestock answers that to send those ships ahead, out of the place in the line prescribed to them by the commander-in-chief, was breaking the line, which should expose him to condign punishment; and this opinion the Court also adopts: "The [only] messages sent to the Vice-Admiral by the Admiral's two lieutenants were to make what sail he possibly could, and to close the line with his division; no signal was made for him to chase with his division, or send ships of his division to chase; without which, _while the signal for the line of battle was flying_, and more especially after the messages brought him, he could not, _without breach of duty_, either have chased or sent ships to chase out of the line." It is to be noted that the word "chase" is here used in the strictest technical sense, not merely to exclude Lestock from diverting a ship to some other purpose than that of the engagement, but even from shifting her place in the general order in the view of furthering the engagement; for the Court says again: "The Vice-Admiral could not send any ships of his division to the relief of the _Namur_ and _Marlborough without breaking the order of battle_, there being four ships of the Admiral's division" (to wit, the _Dorsetshire_ and that crowd) "stationed between the Vice-Admiral's division and the _Marlborough_, which four ships might have gone to the assistance of the _Marlborough_." The second in command thus had no liberty to repair either the oversights of his superior, or the results of obvious bad conduct in juniors; for Burrish's backwardness was observed throughout the rear. There was a long road yet to travel to Nelson's personal action at St. Vincent and Copenhagen, or to his judicious order at Trafalgar, "The Second in command will, after my intentions are made known to him, have the entire direction of his line." Even that great officer Hood, off the Chesapeake in 1781, felt himself tied hand and foot by the union flag at the mizzen peak,--the signal for the line. Only the commander-in-chief could loose the bonds; either by his personal initiative alone, and vigilant supervision, as did Hawke and Rodney, or by adding to this the broad view of discretion in subordinates which Nel
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53  
54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

division

 
Admiral
 

signal

 
Lestock
 

Marlborough

 

messages

 
breaking
 

commander

 

engagement

 

command


battle

 
personal
 

action

 

Nelson

 

travel

 

conduct

 

liberty

 
assistance
 

stationed

 

repair


oversights

 

Burrish

 

backwardness

 

observed

 

juniors

 
superior
 
results
 

obvious

 
adding
 

mizzen


initiative
 

vigilant

 

Rodney

 

Chesapeake

 
subordinates
 

supervision

 

intentions

 

Second

 
Copenhagen
 

judicious


Trafalgar

 
officer
 

discretion

 

entire

 

direction

 
Vincent
 

condign

 
punishment
 

opinion

 

expose