FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90  
91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   >>   >|  
n equal chance of securing any advantage, the chances are in the same proportion as their relative strengths. If the majority be twice as strong as the minority, it will have twice the chance of gaining the advantage. To prove this, consider the position of a one-third minority in a number of five-seat electorates. The Droop quota being one-sixth of the votes, the minority will secure two seats or 40 per cent. in those electorates where it is just over one-third, and one seat or 20 per cent. where it is just under. Since the mathematical chances are that it will be over in one half and under in the other half, it will, on the average, secure only 30 per cent., although entitled to 33 per cent. Again, if the 670 members of the House of Commons were elected in three to five-seat electorates, and the Droop quota used as proposed by Sir John Lubbock, and if the Ministerialists were twice as strong as the Oppositionists, they would, on the average, return 30 more members than the two-thirds to which they are entitled, and this would count 60 members on a division. The following table illustrates the erroneous result obtained by applying the Droop quota when a number of grouped-electorates are concerned. It will be noticed that where parties are nearly equal it makes very little difference which unit is used:-- +-------------+--------------------------------------------+ | STRENGTH OF | AVERAGE REPRESENTATION. | | +----------------------+---------------------+ | PARTY |Five-Seat Electorates.|Ten-Seat Electorates.| +-------------+----------------------+---------------------+ | 10 per cent.| 2 per cent. | 6 per cent. | | 20 " " | 14 " " | 17 " " | | 30 " " | 26 " " | 28 " " | | 40 " " | 38 " " | 39 " " | | 50 " " | 50 " " | 50 " " | +-------------+----------------------+---------------------+ The Droop quota, therefore, gives, not proportional, but disproportional representation. +Election by Each Party of its Most Popular Candidates.+--Still keeping in mind the six-seat electorate for the Federal Senate, we may note that there are two rival systems in the field--the _scrutin de liste_ or Block Vote, in which each elector votes for any six of the candidates, and the Hare system, which allows each elector an effective vote for one candidate
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90  
91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

electorates

 

minority

 

members

 
entitled
 
Electorates
 

chances

 

average

 
advantage
 

number

 

chance


elector

 

strong

 

secure

 
proportional
 

system

 

representation

 

disproportional

 
effective
 

REPRESENTATION

 
AVERAGE

Election

 
Popular
 

scrutin

 

Senate

 
Federal
 

candidate

 

systems

 

STRENGTH

 

candidates

 

Candidates


electorate

 

keeping

 

Oppositionists

 

mathematical

 
Commons
 

elected

 
position
 
relative
 
proportion
 

securing


strengths

 

gaining

 

majority

 
proposed
 

grouped

 

concerned

 

applying

 
result
 

obtained

 
noticed