FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138  
139   140   141   142   143   >>  
ate with the absolute majority is then elected. We propose to consider the different ways in which elimination might be made. We assume, in the first place, that each elector has cast an advance vote--_i.e._, that he has placed all the candidates in order of preference. The most primitive method is to eliminate at each successive count the candidate who has least first preferences. This is the method adopted in the Hare system, and we have already shown that it is very defective; in fact, it is no improvement at all. The eliminated candidate might be most in general favour, and might be able to beat each of the other candidates single-handed. A second method is to use Preferential Voting to decide which candidate should be eliminated at each successive count. This is far superior, but it is extremely complicated, and is open to the objection that when there are a large number of candidates a small section may cause the rejection of the general favourite. We propose to describe a method based on the Block Vote which is much simpler, and which does not lend itself to abuse. We have shown that the Block Vote works best when the candidates can be divided into two equal sections of favour and non-favour. Suppose there are four candidates, the first two preferences should therefore be counted as effective votes, instead of the first preference only. The eliminated candidate will then be the least in general favour. A second count is then made of the three candidates left, and the first preferences and half of the second preferences are counted as effective, and the lowest again eliminated. The candidate who has an absolute majority is then elected. The method may be indefinitely extended; if there are five candidates the first two preferences and one-half of the third preferences are counted, and so on. But when there are a great many candidates more than one might be eliminated. Any number up to eight could be safely reduced to four at the first count. FOOTNOTE: [8] The bracket principle introduced by Professor Nanson into the Hare system involves a partial recognition of this fact. CHAPTER IX. ATTEMPTS TO IMPROVE THE PRESENT SYSTEM. +The Double Election.+--In the preceding chapter we have strongly insisted that the different methods considered for ensuring the return of the candidate acceptable to all sections are not applicable to the election of legislators. The true principles of political representatio
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138  
139   140   141   142   143   >>  



Top keywords:

candidates

 

preferences

 
candidate
 

eliminated

 

method

 
favour
 

counted

 

general

 

system

 

number


majority

 

absolute

 
effective
 

sections

 
propose
 
elected
 
preference
 

successive

 

reduced

 

safely


extended

 

lowest

 
indefinitely
 

PRESENT

 

insisted

 

methods

 
considered
 

strongly

 

chapter

 

Election


preceding

 

ensuring

 

return

 

principles

 

political

 

representatio

 

legislators

 
acceptable
 

applicable

 

election


Double

 

SYSTEM

 
Professor
 
Nanson
 

involves

 

introduced

 

bracket

 
principle
 

partial

 

recognition