FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231  
232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   >>   >|  
aese, as he is called, to personate the Father, exactly as in the _Taming of the Shrew_, by the pretended danger of his coming from Sienna to Ferrara, contrary to the order of the government. Still, Shakespeare quotes a line from the _Eunuch_ of Terence: by memory too, and, what is more, "purposely alters it, in order to bring the sense within the compass of one line."--This remark was previous to Mr. Johnson's; or indisputably it would not have been made at all.--"Our Authour had this line from Lilly; which I mention that it may not be brought as an argument of his learning." But how, cries an unprovoked Antagonist, can you take upon you to say that he had it from Lilly, and not from Terence? I will answer for Mr. Johnson, who is above answering for himself.--Because it is quoted as it appears in the _Grammarian_, and not as it appears in the _Poet_.--And thus we have done with the _purposed_ alteration. Udall likewise in his _Floures for Latine speakyng, gathered oute of Terence_, 1560, reduces the passage to a single line, and subjoins a Translation. We have hitherto supposed Shakespeare the Author of the _Taming of the Shrew_, but his property in it is extremely disputable. I will give you my opinion, and the reasons on which it is founded. I suppose then the present Play not _originally_ the work of Shakespeare, but restored by him to the Stage, with the whole Induction of the Tinker, and some other occasional improvements; especially in the Character of Petruchio. It is very obvious that the _Induction_ and the _Play_ were either the works of different hands, or written at a great interval of time: the former is in our Author's _best_ manner, and the greater part of the _latter_ in his _worst_, or even below it. Dr. Warburton declares it to be _certainly_ spurious: and without doubt, _supposing_ it to have been written by Shakespeare, it must have been one of his _earliest_ productions; yet it is not mentioned in the List of his Works by Meres in 1598. I have met with a facetious piece of Sir John Harrington, printed in 1596 (and possibly there may be an earlier Edition), called, _The Metamorphosis of Ajax_, where I suspect an allusion to the old Play: "Read the _booke_ of _Taming a Shrew_, which hath made a number of us so perfect, that _now_ every one can rule a Shrew in our Countrey, save he that hath hir."--I am aware, a _modern_ Linguist may object that the word _Book_ does not at present seem _dramati
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231  
232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Shakespeare

 

Terence

 

Taming

 

Johnson

 

appears

 

written

 

present

 

Author

 

Induction

 

called


occasional

 

improvements

 

Warburton

 
declares
 

supposing

 

Tinker

 
spurious
 
Character
 

interval

 

obvious


Petruchio

 

earliest

 
manner
 

greater

 

perfect

 

Countrey

 

number

 

dramati

 

object

 

modern


Linguist

 

allusion

 

suspect

 

facetious

 

mentioned

 

Harrington

 

Metamorphosis

 

Edition

 

earlier

 

printed


possibly

 

productions

 

passage

 
Authour
 

indisputably

 

previous

 

compass

 

remark

 
mention
 
unprovoked