FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204  
205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   >>   >|  
ayhouse as "at present so ruinous that part thereof is already fallen down, and the rest will suddenly follow." Accordingly, they inserted in the _Mercurius Politicus_ of February 14-21, 1661, the following advertisement: "The Fortune Playhouse, situate between Whitecross Street and Golding Lane, in the parish of St. Giles, Cripplegate, with the ground thereto belonging, is to be let to be built upon."[481] [Footnote 481: Discovered by Stevens, and printed in Malone, _Variorum_, III, 55, note 5. Mr. W.J. Lawrence, _Archiv fuer das Studium der Neueren Sprachen und Literaturen_ (1914), p. 314, says that the date of this advertisement is 1660. But the same advertisement is reprinted by H.R. Plomer in _Notes and Queries_ (series X), VI, 107, from _The Kingdom's Intelligencer_ of March 18, 1661.] No one seems to have cared to lease the property; so on March 16, following, the materials of the building were sold to one William Beaven for the sum of L75;[482] and in the records of the College, March 4, 1662, we read that "the said playhouse ... is since totally demolished."[483] [Footnote 482: Young, _The History of Dulwich College_, II, 265.] [Footnote 483: Collier, _The Alleyn Papers_, p. 101. I am aware of the fact that there are references to later incidents at the Fortune (for example, the statement that it was visited by officers in November, 1682, in an attempt to suppress secret conventicles that had long been held there), but in view of the unimpeachable documentary evidence cited above (in 1662 the College authorities again refer to it as "the late ruinous and now demolished Fortune playhouse"), we must regard these later references either as inaccurate, or as referring to another building later erected in the same neighborhood. The so-called picture of the Fortune, printed in Wilkinson's _Londina Illustrata_, and often reproduced by modern scholars, cannot possibly be that of the playhouse erected by Alleyn. For an interesting surmise as to the history of this later building see W.J. Lawrence, _Restoration Stage Nurseries_, in _Archiv fuer das Studium der Neueren Sprachen und Literaturen_ (1914), p. 301.] CHAPTER XIV THE RED BULL The builder of the Red Bull Playhouse[484] was "one Aaron Holland, yeoman," of whom we know little more than that he "was utterly unlearned and illiterate, not being able to read."[485] He had leased "for many years" from Anne Beddingfield, "wife and administratrix
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204  
205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Fortune

 

building

 

Footnote

 

advertisement

 
College
 

playhouse

 

Archiv

 
Sprachen
 

Neueren

 
Lawrence

references

 
printed
 

Alleyn

 

Literaturen

 
erected
 

demolished

 

Studium

 

Playhouse

 

ruinous

 

illiterate


utterly

 

unimpeachable

 

unlearned

 
documentary
 

authorities

 

evidence

 
visited
 

officers

 

November

 

Beddingfield


statement

 

administratrix

 

incidents

 

secret

 
suppress
 

leased

 
attempt
 

conventicles

 

regard

 
CHAPTER

builder

 

scholars

 
Nurseries
 

Restoration

 
history
 

surmise

 
possibly
 
interesting
 

Holland

 
referring