FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220  
221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   >>   >|  
d Burbage, and the Children being thus left without a home were dispersed. Early in 1609, probably in February, Robert Keysar (the manager of the Blackfriars troupe), Philip Rosseter, and others secured the lease of the Whitefriars Playhouse from Drayton and the rest of the discontented sharers, and reassembled there the Children of Blackfriars. What became of the Whitefriars troupe we do not know; but it is highly likely that the new organization took over the better actors from Drayton's company. At any rate, we do not hear again of the Children of His Majesty's Revels. When Keysar and this new troupe of child-actors moved into Whitefriars, Slaiter and his family of ten were expelled from the building. This led to a lawsuit, and explains much in the legal documents printed by Greenstreet. Slaiter complained with no little feeling that he had been "riotously, willfully, violently, and unlawfully, contrary to the said articles and pretended agreement [by which he had been not only engaged as a manager, but also guaranteed a home for the period of "all the term of years in the lease"], put and kept out of his said rooms of habitation for him, this defendant, and his family, and all other his means of livelihood, thereby leaving this defendant and his whole family, being ten in number, to the world to seek for bread and other means to live by."[530] [Footnote 530: Greenstreet, _The New Shakspere Society's Transactions_ (1887-90), p. 283.] The new Whitefriars troupe acted five plays at Court during the winter of 1609-10. Payments therefor were made to Robert Keysar, and the company was referred to merely as "The Children of the Whitefriars." But on January 4, 1610, the company secured a royal patent authorizing the use of the title "The Children of the Queen's Revels."[531] The patent was granted to Robert Daborne, Philip Rosseter, John Tarbock, Richard Jones, and Robert Browne; but Keysar, though not named in the grant, was still one of the important sharers.[532] [Footnote 531: Printed in The Malone Society's _Collections_, I, 271.] [Footnote 532: See Keysar _v._ Burbage _et al._, printed by Mr. Wallace, in his _Shakespeare and his London Associates_, pp. 80 ff.] The troupe well deserved the patronage of the Queen. Keysar described the Blackfriars Children whom he had reorganized as "a company of the most expert and skillful actors within the realm of England, to the number of eighteen or twenty persons, all
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220  
221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Keysar

 

Children

 

Whitefriars

 

troupe

 
Robert
 

company

 

Footnote

 
actors
 

family

 
Blackfriars

manager

 
patent
 

defendant

 

Slaiter

 
Revels
 

printed

 

Philip

 

sharers

 

Burbage

 

secured


Drayton

 

Society

 

number

 
Rosseter
 

Greenstreet

 

referred

 
authorizing
 

January

 

winter

 

persons


Shakspere

 

Transactions

 

twenty

 

therefor

 
Payments
 

eighteen

 
Richard
 

Wallace

 

Shakespeare

 
London

Associates

 

skillful

 
reorganized
 

patronage

 
deserved
 

expert

 
Browne
 
Tarbock
 

granted

 
Daborne