FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215  
216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   >>   >|  
lare Market, which they had fitted up as a theatre; see Halliwell-Phillipps, _A Collection of Ancient Documents_, p. 34.] [Footnote 518: See Pepys' _Diary_, April 25, 1664.] CHAPTER XV WHITEFRIARS The district of Whitefriars, lying just outside the city wall to the west, and extending from Fleet Street to the Thames, was once in the possession of the order of White Friars, and the site of an important monastery; but in Elizabeth's time the church had disappeared, most of the ancient buildings had been dismantled, and in their place, as Stow tells us, were "many fair houses builded, lodgings for noblemen and others." Since at the dissolution of the monasteries the property had come into the possession of the Crown, it was not under the jurisdiction of the London Common Council--a fact which made Whitefriars, like Blackfriars, a desirable refuge for players seeking to escape the hostility of the city authorities.[519] One might naturally expect the appearance of playing here at an early date, but the evidence is slight.[520] [Footnote 519: Whitefriars passed under city control in 1608 by grant of King James I, but certain rights remained, notably that of sanctuary. This has been celebrated in Shadwell's play, _The Squire of Alsatia_, and in Scott's romance, _The Fortunes of Nigel_.] [Footnote 520: Prynne, in _Histriomastix_ (1633), p. 491, quotes a passage from Richard Reulidge's _Monster Lately Found Out and Discovered_ (1628), in which there is a reference to a playhouse as existing in Whitefriars "not long after" 1580. By "playhouse" Reulidge possibly meant an inn used for acting; but the whole passage, written by a Puritan after the lapse of nearly half a century, is open to grave suspicion, especially in its details. Again Richard Flecknoe, in _A Short Discourse of the English Stage_ (1664), states that the Children of the Chapel Royal acted in Whitefriars. But that he confused the word "Whitefriars" with "Blackfriars" is shown by the rest of his statement.] The first appearance of a regular playhouse in Whitefriars dates from the early years of King James's reign. With our present knowledge we cannot fix the date exactly, yet we can feel reasonably certain that it was not long before 1607--probably about 1605. The chief spirit in the organization of the new playhouse seems to have been the poet Michael Drayton, who had secured a patent from King James to "erect" a company of child actors, t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215  
216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Whitefriars

 

playhouse

 

Footnote

 

appearance

 
Blackfriars
 

Richard

 

possession

 
Reulidge
 

passage

 
acting

Puritan

 
century
 

written

 

suspicion

 
Monster
 

Lately

 

Fortunes

 

quotes

 

Prynne

 

Histriomastix


Discovered

 

romance

 

possibly

 
existing
 

reference

 

spirit

 
organization
 

patent

 

company

 

actors


secured

 

Michael

 

Drayton

 

knowledge

 
Chapel
 

Children

 
Alsatia
 

states

 

Flecknoe

 
Discourse

English

 

confused

 
present
 

regular

 
statement
 

details

 
slight
 
Friars
 

important

 
Thames