FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222  
223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   >>   >|  
that there might be a cessation of playing and plays to be acted in the said house near St. Paul's Church aforesaid, for which the said Rosseter compounded with the said Pierce to give him, the said Pierce, twenty pounds per annum.[534] [Footnote 534: Wallace, _Shakespeare and his London Associates_, p. 95.] By this means Rosseter disposed of the competition of the Paul's Boys. But, although he secured a monopoly on child-acting, he failed to secure a monopoly on private playhouses, for shortly after he had sealed this bargain with Pierce, the powerful King's Men opened up at Blackfriars. Rosseter promptly requested them to pay half the "dead rent" to Pierce, which they good-naturedly agreed to do. In 1613 Whitefriars was rented by certain London apprentices for the performance "at night" of Robert Taylor's _The Hog Hath Lost His Pearl_. The episode is narrated by Sir Henry Wotton in a letter to Sir Edmund Bacon: On Sunday last, at night, and no longer, some sixteen apprentices (of what sort you shall guess by the rest of the story) having secretly learnt a new play without book,[535] entitled _The Hog Hath Lost His Pearl_, took up the Whitefriars for their theatre, and having invited thither (as it should seem) rather their mistresses than their masters, who were all to enter _per buletini_ for a note of distinction from ordinary comedians. Towards the end of the play the sheriffs (who by chance had heard of it) came in (as they say) and carried some six or seven of them to perform the last act at Bridewell. The rest are fled. Now it is strange to hear how sharp-witted the city is, for they will needs have Sir John Swinerton, the Lord Mayor, be meant by the Hog, and the late Lord Treasurer by the Pearl.[536] [Footnote 535: Miss Gildersleeve, in her valuable _Government Regulation of the Elizabethan Drama_, p. 112, says: "Just what is the meaning of 'a new Play without Book' no one seems to have conjectured." And she develops the theory that "it refers to the absence of a licensed play-book," etc. The phrase "to learn without book" meant simply "to memorize."] [Footnote 536: _Reliquiae Wottonianae_ (ed. 1672), p. 402. The letter is dated merely 1612-13. In connection with the play one should study _The Hector of Germany_, 1615.] Apparently the Children of the Queen's Revels continued successfully at Whitefriars u
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222  
223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Pierce

 

Footnote

 

Rosseter

 

Whitefriars

 
apprentices
 

letter

 

monopoly

 
London
 

Gildersleeve

 
valuable

witted

 
playing
 

Swinerton

 

Treasurer

 
cessation
 

sheriffs

 

chance

 

Towards

 

distinction

 

ordinary


comedians

 

carried

 

Bridewell

 
strange
 

perform

 

Elizabethan

 
connection
 

Reliquiae

 

Wottonianae

 

Hector


Revels

 

continued

 

successfully

 

Children

 
Germany
 

Apparently

 
memorize
 

simply

 

meaning

 
Regulation

conjectured

 

licensed

 
phrase
 

absence

 
refers
 

develops

 
theory
 
Government
 

competition

 
rented