FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230  
231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   >>   >|  
t only "broke" the company, but severed his connection with them for ever. He turned the hired men over to other troupes, and sold the stock of apparel "to strangers" for L400. The indignant actors, in June, 1615, drew up "Articles of Grievance" in which they charged Henslowe with having extorted from the company by unjust means the sum of L567; and also "Articles of Oppression" in which they accused him of various dishonorable practices in his dealings with them.[554] [Footnote 554: _Ibid._, pp. 86, 89.] Shortly after severing his connection with the Lady Elizabeth's Men, Henslowe, in March, 1615, seems to have taken over Prince Charles's Men, who, it appears, had been acting at the Swan. To this new company--the "strangers" referred to, I think--he had already transferred some of the hirelings, and had sold the Hope stock of apparel for L400. Henslowe died early in January of the following year, 1616, and his interest in the theatre passed to Edward Alleyn. On March 20, 1616, Alleyn and Meade engaged Prince Charles's Men to continue at the Hope "according to the former articles of agreement had and made with the said Philip [Henslowe] and Jacob [Meade]."[555] The actors acknowledged themselves indebted to Henslowe "for a stock of apparel used for playing apparel, to the value of L400, heretofore delivered unto them by the said Philip,"[556]--the stock formerly used by the Lady Elizabeth's Men; and Alleyn and Meade agreed to accept L200 in full discharge of that debt.[557] [Footnote 555: Collier, _Memoirs of Edward Alleyn_, p. 127; Greg, _Henslowe Papers_, p. 91.] [Footnote 556: Collier, _Memoirs of Edward Alleyn_, p. 127.] [Footnote 557: My interpretation of the relation of Henslowe to Prince Charles's Men differs from the interpretation given by Fleay and adopted by Greg and others. For the evidence bearing on the case see Fleay, _Stage_, pp. 188, 262; Greg, _Henslowe's Diary_, II, 138; Greg, _Henslowe Papers_, p. 90, note; Chambers, _Modern Language Review_, IV, 165; Cunningham, _Revels_, p. xliv; Wallace, _Englische Studien_, XLIII, 390; Murray, _English Dramatic Companies_.] In the winter of 1616-17, Prince Charles's Men quarreled with Meade, who had appropriated an extra day for his bear-baiting. Rosseter had just completed a new private theatre in Porter's Hall, Blackfriars, and that stood invitingly open. So about February they abandoned the Hope, and wrote a letter of explanation to Edward Alle
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230  
231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Henslowe

 

Alleyn

 

Edward

 

Footnote

 

apparel

 

Prince

 

Charles

 

company

 
Papers
 
Elizabeth

interpretation

 

theatre

 
Philip
 

strangers

 

connection

 

actors

 

Articles

 
Collier
 

Memoirs

 
discharge

relation

 
differs
 

evidence

 

bearing

 

adopted

 

Wallace

 

completed

 

private

 

Porter

 

Rosseter


baiting
 

Blackfriars

 
letter
 

explanation

 

abandoned

 

February

 

invitingly

 

appropriated

 

Revels

 

accept


Englische

 

Cunningham

 

Modern

 

Language

 

Review

 

Studien

 
winter
 

quarreled

 

Companies

 

Dramatic