FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236  
237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   >>   >|  
al license under the Great Seal of England "to erect, build, and set up in and upon the said premises before mentioned one convenient playhouse for the said Children of the Revels, the same playhouse to be used by the Children of the Revels for the time being of the Queene's Majesty, and for the Prince's Players, and for the Lady Elizabeth's Players."[571] [Footnote 570: The Malone Society's _Collections_, I, 277. For the location of Puddlewharf see the map of the Blackfriars precinct on page 94.] [Footnote 571: The Malone Society's _Collections_, I, 277.] The work of converting Porter's Hall into a playhouse seems to have begun at once. On September 26, 1615, the Privy Council records "that one Rosseter, and others, having obtained license under the Great Seal of England for the building of a playhouse, have pulled down [i.e., stripped the interior of] a great messuage in Puddlewharf, which was sometimes the house of the Lady Saunders, within the precinct of the Blackfriars, and are now erecting a new playhouse in that place."[572] [Footnote 572: _Ibid._, p. 373.] The city authorities, always hostile to the actors and jealous of any new theatres, made so vigorous a complaint to the Privy Council that the Lords of the Council "thought fit to send for Rosseter." He came, bringing his royal license. This document was carefully "perused by the Lord Chief Justice of England," who succeeded in discovering in the wording of one of its clauses a trivial flaw that would enable the Privy Council, on a technicality, to prohibit the building: "The Lord Chief Justice did deliver to their Lordships that the license granted to the said Rosseter did extend to the building of a playhouse without the liberties of London, and not within the city."[573] Now, in 1608 the liberty of Blackfriars had by a special royal grant been placed within the jurisdiction of the city. Rosseter's license unluckily had described the Lady Saunders's house as being "in the suburbs," though, of course, the description was otherwise specific enough: "all which premises are situate and being within the precinct of the Blackfriars, near Puddlewharf, in the suburbs of London, called by the name of the Lady Saunders's House, or otherwise Porter's Hall." [Footnote 573: The Malone Society's _Collections_, I, 373.] Since "the inconveniences urged by the Lord Mayor and Aldermen were many," the Lords of the Privy Council decided to take advantage of the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236  
237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

playhouse

 

license

 

Council

 

Blackfriars

 

Footnote

 

Rosseter

 

Puddlewharf

 

building

 
Malone
 
Collections

Society

 

precinct

 
Saunders
 

England

 

London

 

suburbs

 

Justice

 
Porter
 

premises

 
Revels

Children

 
Players
 

Aldermen

 

enable

 

prohibit

 

deliver

 

trivial

 

technicality

 

carefully

 

perused


document
 

advantage

 
decided
 

wording

 

inconveniences

 

discovering

 

succeeded

 

clauses

 

unluckily

 

jurisdiction


called

 

specific

 

description

 

liberties

 

extend

 

granted

 
situate
 

Lordships

 

bringing

 

special