FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717  
718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   >>   >|  
the services in many parts of the country, they stepped up demands for remedial action against a situation that they believed continued at the sufferance of the armed forces. Nor were their demands limited to the problem of discrimination in the local community. Civil rights spokesmen backed the complaints of those black servicemen who had begun to question their treatment in the military community itself. Lacking what many of them considered an effective procedure for dealing with racial complaints, black servicemen usually passed on their grievances to congressmen and various civil rights organizations, and these, in turn, took the problems to the Defense Department. The number of complaints over inequalities in promotion, assignment, and racial representation never matched the volume of those on discrimination in the community, nor did their appearance attest to a new set of problems or any particular increase in discrimination. It seemed rather that the black serviceman, after the first flush of victory over segregation, was beginning to perceive from the vantage of his improved position that other and perhaps more subtle barriers stood in his way. Whatever the reason, complaints of discrimination within the services themselves, rarely heard in the Pentagon in the late 1950's, suddenly reappeared.[20-1] Actually, the complaints about discrimination both in the local civilian community and on the military reservation called for a basic alteration in the way the services interpreted their policies of equal treatment and opportunity. In the end it would prove easier for the services to attack the gaudier but ultimately less complicated problems outside their gates. [Footnote 20-1: For discussion of charges of discrimination within the services, see Ltrs, ASD (M) to Congressman Charles C. Diggs, Jr., 15 Mar and 5 Sep 61; and the following Memos: Under SecNav for ASD (M), 16 Mar 62, sub: Discrimination in U.S. Military Services; Dep SecAF for Manpower, Personnel, and Organization for ASD (M), 29 Mar 62, sub: Alleged Racial Discrimination With the Air Force; Dep Under SA (M) For ASD (M), 30 Mar 62, sub: Servicemen's Complaints of Discrimination in the U.S. Military. All in ASD (M) 291.2.] It would be a mistake
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717  
718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

discrimination

 
complaints
 
services
 

community

 

Discrimination

 

problems

 

Military

 

servicemen

 
military
 

treatment


racial

 

demands

 

rights

 

opportunity

 

interpreted

 

alteration

 

policies

 

attack

 

gaudier

 

easier


called
 

Pentagon

 
rarely
 

mistake

 

suddenly

 

ultimately

 

civilian

 

Actually

 

reappeared

 

reservation


Racial

 

reason

 

Alleged

 
SecNav
 

Manpower

 

Services

 

Personnel

 
Organization
 

discussion

 

charges


Servicemen

 

Complaints

 

complicated

 

Footnote

 

Charles

 

Congressman

 

considered

 

effective

 

Lacking

 

question