FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2048   2049   2050   2051   2052   2053   2054   2055   2056   2057   2058   2059   2060   2061   2062   2063   2064   2065   2066   2067   2068   2069   2070   2071   2072  
2073   2074   2075   2076   2077   2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085   2086   2087   2088   2089   2090   2091   2092   2093   2094   2095   2096   2097   >>   >|  
e pursued; if as wealth, then why is no other wealth but slaves included? These objections may perhaps be removed by amendments. Mr. KING thought there was great force in the objections of Mr. GOUVERNEUR MORRIS. He would, however, accede to the proposition for the sake of doing something. Mr. GOUVERNEUR MORRIS. Another objection with him, against admitting the blacks into the census, was, that the people of Pennsylvania would revolt at the idea of being put on a footing with slaves. They would reject any plan that was to have such an effect. Mr. MADISON. Future contributions, it seemed to be understood on all hands, would be principally levied on imports and exports.--pp. 1066-7-8-9; 1070-2-3. On the question on the first clause of Mr. WILLIAMSON's motion, as to taking a census of the _free_ inhabitants, it passed in the affirmative,--Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Carolina, aye--6; Delaware, Maryland, South Carolina, Georgia, no--4. The next clause as to three-fifths of the negroes being considered, Mr. KING, being much opposed to fixing numbers as the rule of representation, was particularly so on account of the blacks. He thought the admission of them along with whites at all, would excite great discontents among the States having no slaves. He had never said, as to any particular point, that he would in no event acquiesce in and support it; but he would say that if in any case such a declaration was to be made by him, it would be in this. He remarked that in the temporary allotment of representatives made by the Committee, the Southern States had received more than the number of their white and three-fifths of their black inhabitants entitled them to. Mr. SHERMAN. South Carolina had not more beyond her proportion than New York and New Hampshire; nor either of them more than was necessary in order to avoid fractions, or reducing them below their proportion. Georgia had more; but the rapid growth of that State seemed to justify it. In general the allotment might not be just, but considering all circumstances he was satisfied with it. Mr. GORHAM was aware that there might be some weight in what had fallen from his colleague, as to the umbrage which might be taken by the people of the Eastern States. But he recollected that when the proposition of Congress for changing the eighth Article of the Confederation was before the Legislature of Massachusetts, the only
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2048   2049   2050   2051   2052   2053   2054   2055   2056   2057   2058   2059   2060   2061   2062   2063   2064   2065   2066   2067   2068   2069   2070   2071   2072  
2073   2074   2075   2076   2077   2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085   2086   2087   2088   2089   2090   2091   2092   2093   2094   2095   2096   2097   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
States
 

Carolina

 

slaves

 

Pennsylvania

 
people
 

census

 
thought
 

objections

 
clause
 
allotment

proportion
 

inhabitants

 

blacks

 

fifths

 
Massachusetts
 

MORRIS

 
GOUVERNEUR
 
proposition
 

Georgia

 

wealth


Southern

 

received

 

entitled

 
SHERMAN
 

number

 

excite

 

discontents

 

acquiesce

 

remarked

 

temporary


representatives

 

declaration

 

support

 

Committee

 
general
 

colleague

 

umbrage

 

weight

 
fallen
 

Eastern


Confederation

 

Legislature

 

Article

 
eighth
 

recollected

 
Congress
 

changing

 

GORHAM

 

fractions

 

reducing