FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156  
157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   >>   >|  
e. Mason and Dixon's line. 12. What other proprietary governments were organized, and what was their fate? 13. Why were proprietary governments unpopular? (Note the exceptions, however.) 14. Classify and define the forms of colonial government in existence at the beginning of the Revolution. 15. Show that these forms differed chiefly in respect to the governor's office. 16. A representative assembly in each of the thirteen colonies:-- a. The basis of representation. b. The control of the public money. c. The spontaneousness of the representative assembly. 17. The governor's council:-- a. The custom in England. b. The council as an upper house. c. The council in Pennsylvania. 18. Compare the colonial systems with the British (1) in organization and (2) in the nature of their political quarrels. 19. What was the American theory of the relation of each colony to the British parliament? 20. What was the American attitude towards maritime regulations? 21. What was the British theory of the relation of the American colonies to parliament? 22. How was the Revolutionary War brought on? 23. Describe the last act of parliament that brought matters to a crisis. Section 2. _The Transition from Colonial to State Governments._ [Sidenote: Dissolution of assemblies and parliaments.] [Sidenote: Committees of Correspondence.] During the earlier part of the Revolutionary War most of the states had some kind of provisional government. The case of Massachusetts may serve as an illustration. There, as in the other colonies, the governor had the power of dissolving the assembly. This was like the king's power of dissolving parliament in the days of the Stuarts. It was then a dangerous power. In modern England there is nothing dangerous in a dissolution of parliament; on the contrary, it is a useful device for ascertaining the wishes of the people, for a new House of Commons must be elected immediately. But in old times the king would turn his parliament out of doors, and as long as he could beg, borrow, or steal enough money to carry on government according to his own notions, he would not order a new election. Fortunately such periods were not very long. The latest instance was in the reign of Charles I, who got on without a parliament from 1629 to 1640.[9] In the American colonies the dissolution of the assembly by the governor was not especially dangerous, but it sometimes made mi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156  
157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

parliament

 

governor

 
assembly
 

colonies

 
American
 

council

 

British

 

government

 

dangerous

 

England


relation

 
Sidenote
 

dissolving

 

brought

 
theory
 
Revolutionary
 
dissolution
 

colonial

 

governments

 
proprietary

representative
 

device

 

modern

 

contrary

 
illustration
 
Massachusetts
 

provisional

 

Stuarts

 

ascertaining

 

people


notions
 

Fortunately

 

election

 

borrow

 

periods

 

latest

 

Commons

 

instance

 

Charles

 
elected

immediately

 
wishes
 
respect
 

office

 

chiefly

 
differed
 

thirteen

 
custom
 

spontaneousness

 
representation