FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118  
119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   >>   >|  
ormed without much ceremonial. A few appropriate solemn words, indicating the giver, the nature of the offering, the deity to which, as well as the purpose for which it was offered, were sufficient. All this would be embodied in the sacrificial formulas known in later times principally by the name of Ya_g_ush, whilst the older one appears to have been Ya_g_ya. The invocation of the deity by different names, and its invitation to enjoy the meal prepared, may be equally old. It was justly regarded as a kind of Ya_g_ush, and called Nigada or Nivid.' [Footnote 41: By an accident two lines containing the names of the sixteen priests in my 'History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature' (p. 469) have been misplaced. Agnidhra and Pot_r_i ought to range with the Brahmans, Pratihart_r_i and Subrahma_n_ya with the Udgat_r_is. See A_s_val. Sutras IV. 1 (p. 286, 'Bibliotheca Indica'); and M. M., Todtenbestattung, p. xlvi. It might be said, however, that the Agnimindha was meant as one of the Hotra_s_a_m_sins, or one of the Seven Priests, the Sapta Hotars. See Haug, Aitareya-brahma_n_a, vol. i. p. 58.] [Footnote 42: Many such allusions were collected in my 'History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature,' p. 486 seq.; some of them have lately been independently discovered by others.] In comparing these sacrificial formulas with the bulk of the Rig-veda hymns, Dr. Haug comes to the conclusion that the former are more ancient. He shows that certain of these formulas and Nivids were known to the poets of the hymns, as they undoubtedly were; but this would only prove that these poets were acquainted with these as well as with other portions of the ceremonial. It would only confirm the view advocated by others, that certain hymns were clearly written for ceremonial purposes, though the ceremonial presupposed by these hymns may in many cases prove more simple and primitive than the ceremonial laid down in the Brahma_n_as and Sutras. But if Dr. Haug tells us that the Rishis tried their poetical talent first in the composition of Ya_g_yas, or verses to be recited while an offering was thrown into the fire, and that the Ya_g_yas were afterwards extended into little songs, we must ask, is this fact or theory? And if we are told that 'there can be hardly any doubt that the hymns which we possess are purely sacrificial, and made only for sacrificial purposes, and that those which express more general ideas,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118  
119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

ceremonial

 

sacrificial

 

formulas

 

Sutras

 
purposes
 
Footnote
 

Literature

 

History

 

Ancient

 

Sanskrit


offering

 

confirm

 

advocated

 

written

 

comparing

 

independently

 

discovered

 
conclusion
 

acquainted

 

undoubtedly


ancient
 
Nivids
 

portions

 

Rishis

 

theory

 

extended

 

express

 
general
 

purely

 

possess


thrown

 
Brahma
 

primitive

 
presupposed
 

simple

 

composition

 
verses
 
recited
 

talent

 

poetical


Todtenbestattung

 

prepared

 

equally

 

invitation

 

appears

 

invocation

 
justly
 

accident

 
Nigada
 

regarded