FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52  
53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>   >|  
ombination shown in Fig. 20. This consists of a train-arm T revolving about the vertical axis OO of the fixed wheel A, which is equal in diameter to F, which receives its motion by the intervention of one idle wheel carried by a stud S fixed in the arm. The second train-arm T' is fixed to the shaft of F and turns with it; A' is secured to the arm T, and F' is actuated by A' also through a single idler carried by T'. We have here a compound train, consisting of two simple planetary trains, A--F and A'--F'; and its action is to be determined by considering them separately. First suppose T' to be removed and find the motion of F; next suppose F to be removed and T fixed, and find the rotation of F'; and finally combine these results, noting that the motion of T' is the same as that of F, and the motion of A' the same as that of T. Then, according to the analysis of Prof. Willis, we shall have (substituting the symbol _t_ for _a_ in the equation of the second train, in order to avoid confusion): n n' - a 1. Train A--F. --- = 1 = --------; m' = 0, m m' - a n' - a whence -------- = 1, n' = 0, = rot. of F. a n n' - t 2. Train A'--F'. --- = 1 = --------; m' = 0, m m' - t n' - t whence again -------- = 1, t = 0, = rot. of F'. -t Of these results, the first is explicable as being the _absolute_ rotation of F, but the second is not; and it will be readily seen that the former would have been equally absurd, had the axis LL been inclined instead of vertical. But in either case we should find the errors neutralized upon combining the two, for according to the theory now under consideration, the wheel A', being fixed to T, turns once upon its axis each time that train arm revolves, and in the same direction; and the revolutions of T' equal the rotations of F, whence finally in train A'--F' we have: n n' - t 3. --- = 1 = --------; in which t = 0, m' = a, m m' - t n' - 0 which gives --------- = 1, or n' = a. a - 0 This is, unquestionably, correct; and indeed it is quite obvious that the effect upon F' is the same, whether we say that during a revolution of T the wheel A' turns on
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52  
53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

motion

 

rotation

 

suppose

 

finally

 

removed

 
vertical
 

results

 

carried

 

inclined

 

errors


neutralized
 

absurd

 

revolving

 

absolute

 

receives

 

explicable

 

readily

 
equally
 

combining

 

correct


unquestionably

 

obvious

 

effect

 

revolution

 

consideration

 

theory

 
rotations
 
revolutions
 

direction

 
revolves

actuated

 

separately

 

secured

 
consists
 

combine

 

consisting

 

single

 

compound

 
simple
 

planetary


determined

 

action

 

trains

 

noting

 

confusion

 

intervention

 
ombination
 
equation
 

diameter

 

analysis