FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31  
32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   >>   >|  
stem of free trade were interfered with, if the attempt were successful which is being made to reverse the policy of the past sixty years on which the overwhelming bulk of political economists were united, I foretell for this country a time of the greatest disaster. All classes would suffer, especially the working class. Dealing with the question of exports and imports, he pointed out: Eighty per cent of what came into Great Britain represented raw material necessary for manufactures and food necessary for the people. Therefore the prosperity of this country depends, not upon its exports, but upon its imports. We are free-traders, not for the injury it does others, but in our own interests. It is to our advantage to buy cheap. Our greatest import is food and the next raw material. We can only pay by our own manufactures. ENGLAND'S DEFENSES, AND WHAT THEY COST. It Is Not Military Strength That Makes a Country Great, Says Lord Avebury, but the Right Use of Power. That the burden of armament lies heavy on Europe is well understood. It is not so commonly known that in the last ten years the cost of army and navy has increased much more rapidly in Great Britain than in any country of the Continent. The fact is brought out in the _Nineteenth Century_ by Lord Avebury, who is better known to Americans as Sir John Lubbock. He says: In our own case there has been on the army an increase in the past ten years of L24,800,000, and on the navy an increase of L25,000,000; or, taking the two together, in round figures an increase of no less than L50,000,000, of which, however, only L39,000,000 is shown in the ordinary estimates. In other words, while Italy has increased her naval and military expenditures by L1,500,000; Russia, L10,800,000; Germany, L8,700,000, and France, L6,000,000, we have increased ours L50,000,000. Thus these four great countries put together show an increase of L27,000,000, while ours by itself is L50,000,000, or nearly double that of Russia, Germany, France, and Italy put together. What justification have we for this enormous increase? I do not wish to exaggerate, nor to maintain that we are going down-hill. But our progress has been checked, and if we are not wise in time worse will follow. Lord Avebury's political opponents would argue that the British military ex
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31  
32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

increase

 
country
 

Avebury

 
increased
 

manufactures

 

material

 

Britain

 

military

 

Russia

 

France


Germany

 

greatest

 
political
 

imports

 

exports

 

Americans

 
ordinary
 

Lubbock

 
estimates
 

taking


figures
 

exaggerate

 

maintain

 

enormous

 

double

 

justification

 

follow

 

opponents

 

checked

 

progress


British

 

expenditures

 

countries

 
Century
 
Eighty
 

Dealing

 

question

 
pointed
 

represented

 

people


interests

 

injury

 

traders

 

Therefore

 

prosperity

 
depends
 

working

 
reverse
 

policy

 

successful