FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159  
160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   >>   >|  
f the _Nothing_ as a _background_ or _contrasting_ element, that the _Something_ has an independent or cognizable existence. If there were no blank space, for instance, there could be no Moon, relatively, or so far as our ability to perceive it is concerned. For the Moon is, in this illustration, a _Something_ which is visible to us, and of which we have a knowledge, only by reason of the fact that it is surrounded by and contrasted with that which is _not_ Moon, and which, in reference to the particular aspect under consideration is, therefore, a _Nothing_; though it in turn may be a _Something_ or main object of attention in some other view or conception, where some other factor shall be the Nothing. That this Relationship of Antithesis and Rank existed, as between the Constituents of some Thoughts or Things, was known from the earliest times, and gave rise to the terms _Positive_ and _Negative_, expressive of it. But Hegel was the first--of modern Philosophers, at least--to point out its necessarily _Universal_ and fundamental character, and to assume it as the starting-point in the development of all Philosophy and Science. So far as concerns the investigation of the Universe from the _Philosophical_ point of view (which is the less precise and definite aspect), Hegel is right in affirming that the first discrimination of all Thought and Being is that between _Something_ and _Nothing_. But he is wrong in regarding the starting-point or first differentiation of _Science_, as being identical with that of _Philosophy_. Science considers, primarily and predominantly, the more exact and rigorous relations of Phenomena; and the existence of an _exact_ and _definite_ point of departure in Thought and Being, more fundamental, from the Scientific or rigorously precise point of view, than that of Hegel, is the initiatory proposition of UNIVERSOLOGY. A full explanation of the nature of this Starting-point is not, however, in place here. And as the discrimination into _Something_ and _Nothing_ serves all the purposes of our present inquiry, a single word respecting the character of the Universological Point of Departure in question is all that it is now necessary to say concerning it. This Starting-point of Thought and Action has reference to the Ideas of _Oneness_ (Primitive Unity) and _Twoness_ (Plurality). These conceptions give rise to _two_ Primordial Principles, which form the basis of the development of UNIVERSOLO
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159  
160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Nothing

 
Something
 
Science
 

Thought

 
reference
 
aspect
 
Starting
 

development

 

existence

 

Philosophy


precise
 
starting
 

definite

 
fundamental
 
character
 

discrimination

 
rigorously
 

rigorous

 

Phenomena

 

relations


Scientific

 

departure

 

affirming

 

initiatory

 

Philosophical

 

considers

 

primarily

 
identical
 
differentiation
 

predominantly


purposes

 

Oneness

 
Primitive
 

Action

 

Twoness

 

Plurality

 

Principles

 

UNIVERSOLO

 

Primordial

 
conceptions

question

 

nature

 

explanation

 

UNIVERSOLOGY

 
serves
 

respecting

 

Universological

 

Departure

 

single

 

Universe