FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50  
51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   >>   >|  
Shakespeare, considering his time, the more democratic in his views of life, as shown by this Play, in comparison with those brought out in Tennyson's Poem. Why does Shakespeare leave the women in moral and actual command of the situation? QUERIES FOR DISCUSSION Is co-education the right conclusion to draw from the exposition by the Poets of educational restraints and the relation of men and women to life? What ideals of life as to Nature and Education must be included in educational schemes? Why does the Play not end with as many marriages as there are lovers? Is it possibly because Shakespeare did not mean to bring forward love between man and woman as if it were the only thing in life but as the typical experience of life that should open up the depths of knowledge not of love alone but of death and suffering in relation to it. MUCH ADOE ABOUT NOTHING The title of this Comedy broadly describes its character, and is based upon the double meaning of "Nothing." The events that constitute the plot are the result of "note-ing" or overhearing and so taking note of events which are deceptive in some way. Hence, in all the "note-ing" that takes place, there is, after all "nothing," and the whole amusing plot constitutes much ado about nothing. The letter "h" in _Nothing_ was often silent in Elizabethan pronunciation. The "h" in "Moth" in "Love's Labour's Lost" is another example. Noting or overhearing as a factor of the plot is introduced also in "Love's Labour's Lost." It is one of several links in workmanship with that Play and its use there may have suggested the production of a Play almost altogether built, as this is, on overhearing or taking critical notice such as Benedicke and Beatrice take of each other. The part of the plot that is based on an already existent story does not develop this noteing element particularly. For that reason it is the likelier that it is a device of Shakespeare's to make up his Comedy. ACT I CLAUDIO NOTES HERO WITH FAVOR AND IS NOTED WITH DISFAVOR The Story of Act I results, on the arrival of the Prince and his suite, in making it known that Claudio has noted Hero as "the sweetest Ladie" that ever he "lookt on." Show how it also comes out in Scene i that a noting of a severer kind has passed between Benedicke and Beatrice. The two kinds of special interest--the openly admiring noting of Claudio, and the captious notice of each other shown by Beatrice and
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50  
51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Shakespeare

 

overhearing

 
Beatrice
 

Claudio

 

Benedicke

 

taking

 

events

 
notice
 

Nothing

 

relation


Labour

 

noting

 

educational

 
Comedy
 
critical
 

suggested

 

factor

 
introduced
 

Noting

 

production


altogether
 

existent

 
workmanship
 

reason

 

sweetest

 

making

 

special

 

interest

 

openly

 
admiring

severer

 

passed

 

Prince

 
likelier
 

pronunciation

 
device
 
captious
 

develop

 

noteing

 
element

CLAUDIO

 
results
 
arrival
 

DISFAVOR

 

marriages

 

brought

 

lovers

 
included
 
schemes
 

Tennyson