FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52  
53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>   >|  
ar that the plot will consist in the prevalence of either a favorable or unfavorable influence upon the happiness of the characters. Who represents each influence? Notice that the favorable influence in its first action in favor of Claudio's happiness is misunderstood, discounted and disbelieved in several directions. Is Claudio led to distrust of the Prince by others or by his own jealousy? In the second action of the favorable influence initiated by the Prince, which of the characters share? Does the unfavorable influence work against Benedicke's happiness? What is Borachio's place in the action of the unfavorable influence? QUERIES FOR DISCUSSION Noteing or overhearing is itself nothing or has a large element of the deceptive in it. How is it made to work well in Benedicke's case? Is the element of truth the only one that is effective? ACT III THE NOTE-ING IS NOTED Show that the action taking the Story on consists in the "note-ing" already planned being enacted and being noted as true. How does this work with Beatrice in Scene i? In Scene ii the unfavorable influence makes its preparation to carry on the plot disastrously by the same method. How is this made clear? In Scene iii the "note-ing" is as effective for evil as that in scene i, is for good. But a counter influence is brought to bear upon it which consists in "noteing" the falsity of the first "noteing." Show how this is arranged and promises to solve all difficulty. But the marriage is shown next to be in active preparation, and then the promise of intervention in time to frustrate Hero's disgrace is in scene v itself frustrated by the bestowal of all Dogberry's "tediousness" upon Leonato and by his own impatience. Show the place in the action of the hurrying on of scene iv, and the tediousness of scene v, and of both on the humor of the Play. QUERIES FOR DISCUSSION Are the Prince and Claudio justified in the action they propose? Is the element of chance, which both destroys the falseness of the evidence by means of Borachio's talk, and prevents it from being known by Dogberry's, especially fitting? Why? ACT IV HERO IS REPUDIATED AND BEFRIENDED Does Claudio's demeanor in the repudiation scene betray the violence of love? What is to be inferred from the Prince's words and those of his bastard brother Don John? Is it natural for Leonato to be convinced and to know his daughter no better? Why is the Friar on her
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52  
53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

influence

 

action

 
Claudio
 

Prince

 

unfavorable

 

element

 

happiness

 
favorable
 

Leonato

 

tediousness


QUERIES

 

DISCUSSION

 

consists

 
effective
 
preparation
 

Borachio

 

noteing

 
Dogberry
 

Benedicke

 

characters


active
 

disgrace

 
frustrate
 

frustrated

 

bestowal

 

promise

 

difficulty

 

intervention

 

hurrying

 
impatience

marriage

 

bastard

 

brother

 
inferred
 

betray

 
violence
 
daughter
 

natural

 

convinced

 
repudiation

demeanor

 
falseness
 
evidence
 

destroys

 

chance

 

justified

 

propose

 
prevents
 
REPUDIATED
 

BEFRIENDED