FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54  
55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>  
sidered? Was Margaret to blame? Why did she not make the cheat known? (Cf. V, iv, 5-7 with V, i, 311-314). Is it worth while to spend much time on making all minor details clear? Is Claudio's consent to a second marriage creditable, natural, or a clumsy expedient which only the entire hollowness of the whole plot of false noting as to Hero renders endurable? Can you imagine any way of acting the part of Claudio that would make it seem attractive? Do you find it in character at the wedding that one couple says so little, the other so much? QUERIES FOR DISCUSSION Is the ending of the Plot happily contrived in too forced and unreal a way? Which is the most stirring scheme in the Play and why? Which is the funniest, and is it possible to say why? THE CHARACTERS Does this Play succeed in giving so extremely definite and varied an impression of the characters that it is chiefly notable for that? To bring out this idea of the plot as successful less in itself than because it illuminates the quality and humor of the characters, compare with the "Comedie of Errors" or any of the Plays where events figure more prominently. Show how the events of this Play may be said to be created by the Characters. The Prince and his Brother (and their tools on each side who lend themselves to their plans with Dogberry, the highly unconscious, and the Friar, the highly conscious character) by being what they are constitute the diverse means of influencing the whole turn of events. These persons may all be considered with reference to what they are themselves, in character, and through that, in relation to the other characters of the Comedy. BENEDICKE AND BEATRICE, CLAUDIO AND HERO These two loving couples reveal their special characters most vividly by means of their contrasting and supplementary relations to each other. Show how Benedicke and Beatrice do not throw Claudio and Hero too much in the shade by their superior brilliancy, because through the love of the minor couple their own love is enabled to ripen. Is their character heightened or lessened in wit and individual interest by love? The minor characters: Show how the adversity of the family brings out the heroic element lying unobserved in Brother Anthony of the "dry hand," and kindles his philosophy into something martial. The merry maids, Ursula and Margaret and their light-hearted parts in the plot. QUERIES FOR DISCUSSION Beatrice "is a tarter,--a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54  
55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>  



Top keywords:
characters
 

character

 
Claudio
 

events

 
couple
 
Beatrice
 
highly
 

DISCUSSION

 

Brother

 

QUERIES


Margaret

 

persons

 

reference

 

relation

 

considered

 

sidered

 

Prince

 

Characters

 

created

 

constitute


diverse

 

influencing

 

Comedy

 

conscious

 
Dogberry
 
unconscious
 

reveal

 

unobserved

 

Anthony

 

element


heroic

 
interest
 
adversity
 

family

 

brings

 

kindles

 

philosophy

 

hearted

 

tarter

 
Ursula

martial
 
individual
 

special

 

vividly

 
contrasting
 

supplementary

 

couples

 

loving

 

BEATRICE

 
CLAUDIO