FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243  
244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   >>   >|  
ental science is simply the summing-up of many diverse experiences, freely attempted, freely discussed and verified. Through the forced results of the university monopoly there are no actual universities: among other results of the Napoleonic institution, one could after 1808 note, the decadence of pedagogy and foresee its early demise. Neither parents, nor masters nor the young cared anything about it; outside of the system in which they live they imagine nothing; they are accustomed to it the same as to the house in which they dwell. They may grumble sometimes at the arrangement of the rooms, the low stories and narrow staircases, against bad lighting, ventilation and want of cleanliness, against the exactions of the proprietor and concierge; but, as for transforming the building, arranging it otherwise, reconstructing it in whole or in part, they never think of it. For, in the first place, they have no plan; and next, the house is too large and its parts too well united; through its mass and size it maintains itself and would still remain indefinitely if, all at once, in 1848, an unforeseen earthquake had not made breaches in its walls. II. Educational monopoly of Church and State. Law of 1850 and freedom of instruction.--Its apparent object and real effects.--Alliance of Church and State.--The real monopoly.--Ecclesiastical control of the University until 1859.--Gradual rupture of the Alliance.--The University again becomes secular.--Lay and clerical interests. --Separation and satisfaction of both interests down to 1876. --Peculiarity of this system.--State motives for taking the upper hand.--Parents, in fact, have no choice between two monopolies.--Original and forced decline of private institutions.--Their ruin complete after 1850 owing to the too-powerful and double competition of Church and State. --The Church and the State sole surviving educators. --Interested and doctrinal direction of the two educational systems.--Increasing divergence in both directions.--Their effect on youth. The day after the 24th of February 1848,[6328] M. Cousin, meeting M. de Remusat on the quay Voltaire, raised his arms towards heaven and exclaimed: "Let us hurry and fall on our knees in front of the bishops--they alone can save us now!" While M. Thiers, with equal vivacity, in the parliamentary committee exclaimed: "Cousin, Cousin, do you c
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243  
244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Church
 

Cousin

 

monopoly

 

exclaimed

 

forced

 

interests

 

Alliance

 
results
 

system

 
freely

University

 

taking

 

choice

 

decline

 

private

 
institutions
 

Original

 
monopolies
 

Parents

 

motives


Peculiarity

 
rupture
 

apparent

 

Gradual

 

Ecclesiastical

 

control

 

secular

 
effects
 

instruction

 

freedom


object
 

clerical

 
complete
 

Separation

 

satisfaction

 

divergence

 

bishops

 

heaven

 

committee

 

parliamentary


vivacity

 

Thiers

 

raised

 
doctrinal
 
Interested
 

direction

 
educational
 

systems

 

educators

 

surviving