FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129  
130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   >>   >|  
through the violation of international law and the seizing of mail. "6. Imprisonment of German reservists aboard neutral ships. "7. a. Violation of Article I of The Hague Convention by the confiscation of the German hospital ship _Ophelia_. b. Murdering of submarine crew upon command of British auxiliary cruiser _Baralong_. c. Violation of Article XXIX, No. 1, of London Declaration by preventing American Red Cross from sending supplies to the German Red Cross. "8. a. Destruction of German cruisers _Kaiser Wilhelm der Grosse_ in Spanish territorial waters by English cruiser _Highflyer_. b. Destruction of German cruiser _Dresden_ in Chinese waters by British cruiser _Glasgow_. c. Attack of British warships on German ship _Paklas_ in Norwegian waters. "9. England armed her merchant ships for attack. "10. Use of neutral flags and signs by British merchantmen in violation of Articles II and III of the Paris Declaration." On page 134, after discussing the question of whether the English blockade has been effective and arguing that England by seizing neutral ships with food on the supposition that the food was going to Germany, he says: "We may conclude from these facts that we Germans can now consider ourselves freed from the uncomfortable conditions of the London Declaration and may conduct the war as our own interests prescribe. We have already partially done this in as much as we followed the English example of extending the lists of war contraband. This has been inconvenient for the neutrals affected and they have protested against it. We may, however, consider that they will henceforth respect our proposals just as they have in the past accepted English interests. England demanded from them that they assist her because England was fighting for the future of neutrals and of justice. We will take this principle also as basis for what we do and even await thereby that we will compel England to grant us the kind of peace which can lay new foundations for sea warfare and that for the future the military acts of belligerents against neutrals will not be carried to the extremes they have been for centuries because of England's superior sea power. This new era of civilised warfare we bring under the term 'freedom of the seas.'" Hollweg's next justification of the unlimited submarine warfare is that Secretary of State Lansing in a note to Count von Bernstorff at first said merchant ships could not
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129  
130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

German

 

England

 

English

 
British
 
cruiser
 

Declaration

 

neutral

 

warfare

 
neutrals
 

waters


Destruction
 

interests

 

future

 

merchant

 

submarine

 

Article

 

Violation

 

violation

 
seizing
 

London


protested

 

Secretary

 

affected

 

centuries

 

unlimited

 

respect

 

Hollweg

 

proposals

 

henceforth

 

Lansing


justification

 

inconvenient

 
carried
 

extremes

 

contraband

 

Bernstorff

 

extending

 
compel
 
superior
 

foundations


partially

 
civilised
 

fighting

 

justice

 
assist
 
accepted
 

demanded

 

principle

 

belligerents

 

freedom