FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75  
76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   >>   >|  
in any way shocking the American people. Nothing has come from Berlin that indicates any feeling of guilt on the part of the German people or their Government. "In the United States, on the contrary, the act is regarded as one of the blackest crimes of history. And yet, in spite of that feeling, we have waited patiently for ten months in the hope that the German Government would do justice, and clear its name of reproach. Yet now we are told that it is Germany that has shown a 'patient attitude,' the implication or insinuation being that our long suffering administration has been unreasonable and impatient. That will not be the verdict of history, as it is not the verdict of our own people. We have made every allowance for the conditions existing in Germany, and have resolutely refused to take advantage of her distress. We doubt whether there is any other government in the world that would have shown the patience and moderation, under like provocation, that have been shown by the American Government in these _Lusitania_ negotiations." I sent the editorial to von Jagow, who returned it the next day with the brief comment on one of his calling cards: "With many thanks." About this time Count Reventlow and the other naval writers began to refer to everything President Wilson did as a "bluff." When Col. E. M. House came to Berlin early in 1916, he tried to impress the officials with the fact that Mr. Wilson was not only not bluffing, but that the American people would support him in whatever he did in dealing with the German Government. Mr. Gerard tried too to impress the Foreign Office but because he could only deal with that branch of the Government, he could not change the Navy's impression, which was that Wilson would never take a definite stand against Germany. On the 8th of February, the _London Times_ printed the following despatch which I had sent to the United States: "Mr. Gerard has been accused of not being forceful enough in dealing with the Berlin Foreign Office. In Berlin he has been criticised for just the opposite. It has been stated frequently that he was too aggressive. The Ambassador's position was that he must carry out Mr. Wilson's ideas. So he tried for days and weeks to impress officials with the seriousness of the situation. At the critical point in the negotiations various unofficial diplomats began to arrive and they seriously interfered with negotiations. One of these wa
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75  
76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Government

 

Wilson

 
Berlin
 

people

 

Germany

 
negotiations
 

impress

 

American

 

German

 

Foreign


verdict
 

Office

 
dealing
 

officials

 

Gerard

 

States

 

history

 
United
 

feeling

 

branch


change

 
Nothing
 

shocking

 

impression

 

February

 
definite
 

contrary

 
reproach
 
support
 

bluffing


London
 

situation

 

critical

 

seriousness

 

interfered

 

unofficial

 
diplomats
 

arrive

 

forceful

 

criticised


accused

 

printed

 

despatch

 
opposite
 
Ambassador
 

position

 

aggressive

 

stated

 

frequently

 

waited