FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214  
215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   >>  
e, if you accept, as I am inclined to do, the theory of Dr. Latham, that we were always 'Markmen,' men of the Marches, occupying a narrow frontier between the Slavs and the Roman Empire; and that Tacitus has included among Germans, from hearsay, many tribes of the interior of Bohemia, Prussia, and Poland, who were Slavs or others; and that the numbers and area of our race has been, on Tacitus' authority, greatly overrated. What then were the causes of the success of the Teutons? Native courage and strength? They had these: but you must recollect what I have told you, that those very qualities were employed against them; that they were hired, in large numbers, into the Roman armies, to fight against their own brothers. Unanimity? Of that, alas! one can say but little. The great Teutonic army had not only to fight the Romans, but to fight each brigade the brigade before it, to make them move on; and the brigade behind it likewise, to prevent their marching over them; while too often two brigades quarrelled like children, and destroyed each other on the spot. What, then, was the cause of their success? I think a great deal of it must be attributed to their admirable military position. Look at a map of Europe; putting yourself first at the point to be attacked--at Rome, and looking north, follow the German frontier from the Euxine up the Danube and down the Rhine. It is a convex arc: but not nearly as long as the concave arc of the Roman frontier opposed to it. The Roman frontier overlaps it to the north-west by all Britain, to the south-west by part of Turkey and the whole of Asia Minor. That would seem to make it weak, and liable to be outflanked on either wing. In reality it made it strong. Both the German wings rested on the sea; one on the Euxine, one on the North Sea. That in itself would not have given strength; for the Roman fleets were masters of the seas. But the lands in the rear, on either flank, were deserts, incapable of supporting an army. What would have been the fate of a force landed at the mouth of the Weser on the north, or at the mouth of the Dnieper at the west? Starvation among wild moors, and bogs, and steppes, if they attempted to leave their base of operations on the coast. The Romans saw this, and never tried the plan. To defend the centre of their position was the safest and easiest plan. Look at this centre. It is complicated. The Roman position is guarded by the wal
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214  
215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   >>  



Top keywords:

frontier

 

brigade

 

position

 

success

 

strength

 

numbers

 
Romans
 

Tacitus

 

Euxine

 

German


centre
 

follow

 

opposed

 

Britain

 

outflanked

 

liable

 

overlaps

 

Turkey

 
Danube
 

concave


convex

 
steppes
 

attempted

 

Starvation

 

landed

 
Dnieper
 

operations

 
easiest
 

safest

 

complicated


guarded

 

defend

 

rested

 

reality

 

strong

 

attacked

 

deserts

 
incapable
 

supporting

 

fleets


masters
 
authority
 

greatly

 
Bohemia
 
Prussia
 
Poland
 

overrated

 

recollect

 

Teutons

 

Native