osing interests of the several states 25
34. Contrasted methods of drafting 25
35. These difficulties distinct from those due to
carelessness. Article 23 (_h_) of the Hague
Regulations of land war is an example 27
36. The German and the English interpretation of
Article 23 (_h_) 27
37. Davis's interpretation of Article 23 (_h_) 28
38. Impossible to reconcile the divergent views about
Article 23 (_h_) 29
39. Difficulties due to the fact that international law
cannot be made by a majority vote, or repealed save by
a unanimous vote. A way out found in the difference
between universal and general international law 30
40. International laws which are limited in point of time 31
41. International legislation no longer to be left to mere
chance 33
42. The Declaration of London thoroughly prepared beforehand 34
43. The preparation of the Declaration a pattern for future
international legislation 34
44. Intentionally incomplete and fragmentary laws 35
45. Interpretation of international statutes 35
46. International differences as regards interpretation 36
47. Different nations have different canons of interpretation 37
48. Controverted interpretation of the Declaration of London
an example 37
49. Some proposals for the avoidance of difficulties in
interpretation 39

CHAPTER III

INTERNATIONAL ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

50. Law can exist without official administration 41
51. The Hague Court of Arbitration as a permanent institution 41
52. The proposed International Prize Court and Court of
Arbitral Justice 42
53. Does the constitution of the International Prize Court
violate the principle of the equality of states? 43
54. Does the International Prize Court restrict the sovereignty
of the several states? 43
55. Would the formation of