FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91  
92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   >>   >|  
, formulated with an open chain, there is little to surmise beyond the change of position of a CO- group. But alternative formulae have been proposed. Thus the tetracetate is a derivative to be reckoned with in the problem. It is formed under conditions which preclude constitutional changes within the unit groups. The temperature of the main reaction is 30 deg.-40 deg., the reagents are used but little in excess of the quantitative proportions, and the yields are approximately quantitative. If now the derivative is formed entirely without the hydrolysis the empirical formula C_{6}H_{6}O.(OAc)_{4} justifies a closed-ring formula for the original viz. CO<[CHOH]_{4}>CH_{2}; and the preference for this formula depends upon the explanation it affords of the aggregation of the groups by way of CO-CH_{2} synthesis. The exact relationship of the tetracetate to the original cellulose is somewhat difficult to determine. The starting-point is a cellulose hydrate, since it is the product obtained by decomposition of the sulphocarbonate. The degree of _hydrolysis_ attending the cycle of reactions is indicated by the formula 4 C_{6}H_{10}O_{5}.H_{2}O. It has been already shown that this degree of hydrolysis does not produce molecular disaggregation. If this hydrate survived the acetylation it would of course affect the empirical composition, i.e. chiefly the carbon percentage, of the product. It may be here pointed out that the extreme variation of the carbon in this group of carbohydrate esters is as between C_{14}H_{20}O_{10} (C = 48.3 p.ct.) and C_{14}H_{18}O_{9} (C = 50.8 p.ct.) i.e. a tetracetate of C_{6}H_{12}O_{6} and C_{6}H_{10}O_{5} respectively. In the fractional intermediate terms it is clear that we come within the range of ordinary experimental errors, and to solve this critical point by way of ultimate analysis must involve an extended series of analyses with precautions for specially minimising and quantifying the error. The determination of the acetyl by saponification is also subject to an error sufficiently large to preclude the results being applied to solve the point. While, therefore, we must defer the final statement as to whether the tetracetate is produced from or contains a partly hydrolysed cellulose molecule, it is clear that at least a large proportion of the unit groups must be acetylated in the proportion C_{6}H_{6}O.(OAc)_{4}. It has been shown that by the method of Franchimont a higher proportion o
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91  
92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
tetracetate
 

formula

 

hydrolysis

 
proportion
 

cellulose

 
groups
 

empirical

 

degree

 

hydrate

 

product


quantitative

 
original
 

derivative

 

formed

 

preclude

 

carbon

 

pointed

 

intermediate

 

fractional

 
partly

esters

 

hydrolysed

 
carbohydrate
 

extreme

 

variation

 

higher

 

saponification

 
subject
 

sufficiently

 
acetyl

determination

 

minimising

 

quantifying

 

produced

 
results
 

statement

 

applied

 
specially
 

precautions

 

ultimate


analysis

 
critical
 

ordinary

 

experimental

 

errors

 

involve

 

method

 

acetylated

 

Franchimont

 

analyses