FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148  
149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   >>   >|  
cute Father discovers a great inconvenience in this argument, for it forces us to say that the Father is not wise, but by that Wisdom which he begot, not being himself Wisdom as the Father: and then we must consider whether the Son himself, as he is God of God, and Light of Light, may be said to be Wisdom of Wisdom, if God the Father be not Wisdom, but only begets Wisdom. The proper answer to Augustine is, that the Son and Holy Ghost are necessary and essential, not contingent: and that 'his' argument has a still greater inconvenience, as shewn in note p. 98. Ib. pp. 110-113. But what makes St. Gregory dispute thus nicely, and oppose the common and ordinary forms of speech? Did he in good earnest believe that there is but one man in the world? No, no! he acknowledged as many men as we do; a great multitude who had the same human nature, and that every one who had a human nature was an individual man, distinguished and divided from all other individuals of the same nature. What makes him so zealous then against saying, that Peter, James and John are three men? Only this; that he says man is the name of nature, and therefore to say there are three men is the same as to say, there are three human natures of a different kind; for if there are three human natures, they must differ from each other, or they cannot be three; and so you deny Peter, James, and John to be [Greek: homoousioi], or of the same nature; and for the same reason we must say that though the Father be God, the Son God, and the Holy Ghost God, yet there are not three Gods, but [Greek: mia theotaes], one Godhead and Divinity. Sherlock struggles in vain, in my opinion at least, to clear these Fathers of egregious logomachy, whatever may have been the soundness of their faith, spite of the quibbles by which they endeavoured to evince its rationality. The very change of the terms is suspicious. "Yes! we might say three Gods" (it would be answered,) "as we say and ought to say three men: for man and humanity, [Greek: anthropos] and [Greek: anthropotaes] are not the same terms;--so if the Father be God, the Son God, and the Holy Ghost God, there would be three Gods, though not [Greek: treis theotaetes],--that is, three Godheads." Ib. p. 115-16. Gregory Nyssen tells us that [Greek: theos] is [Greek: theataes] and [Greek: ephoros], the inspector and governor of the world, that is, it is a name of energy,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148  
149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Wisdom

 
Father
 

nature

 

Gregory

 

natures

 

inconvenience

 
argument
 
opinion
 

Fathers

 

egregious


logomachy

 

Godhead

 

homoousioi

 

reason

 

Divinity

 
Sherlock
 

theotaes

 
struggles
 

theotaetes

 

Godheads


anthropotaes

 

humanity

 

anthropos

 
Nyssen
 

inspector

 

governor

 

energy

 

ephoros

 
theataes
 

answered


quibbles

 

endeavoured

 
evince
 

soundness

 

rationality

 

suspicious

 
discovers
 
change
 

differ

 

common


ordinary
 

oppose

 

nicely

 

dispute

 

speech

 

proper

 

begets

 
answer
 

earnest

 
Augustine