FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170  
171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   >>   >|  
want of insight into the true sense of the Scripture texts. Indeed without detracting from the inestimable services of the Fathers from Tertullian to Augustine respecting the fundamental article of the Christian Faith, yet commencing from the fifth century, I dare claim for the Reformed Church of England the honorable name of [Greek: archaspistaes] of Trinitarianism, and the foremost rank among the Churches, Roman or Protestant: the learned Romanist divines themselves admit this, and make a merit of the reluctance with which they nevertheless admit it, in respect of Bishop Bull. [2] Ib. p. 421. It seems to me that if there be not reasons of conscience obliging a good man to speak out, there are always reasons of prudence which should make a wise man hold his tongue. True, and as happily expressed. To this, however, the honest Anti-Trinitarian must come at last: "Well, well, I admit that John and Paul thought differently; but this remains my opinion." Query XXVII. p. 427. [Greek: Ton alaethinon kai ontos onta Theon, ton tou Christou patera]. --Athanas. Cont. Gent. The just and literal rendering of the passage is this: 'The true God who in reality is such, namely, the Father of Christ.' The passage admits of a somewhat different interpretation from this of Waterland's, and of equal, if not greater, force against the Arian notion: namely, taking [Greek: ton ontos onta] distinctively from [Greek: ho on]--the 'Ens omnis entitatis, etiam suae', that is, the I Am the Father, in distinction from the 'Ens Supremum', the Son. It cannot, however, be denied that in changing the 'formula' of the 'Tetractys' into the 'Trias', by merging the 'Prothesis' in the 'Thesis', the Identity in the Ipseity, the Christian Fathers subjected their exposition to many inconveniences. Ib. p. 432. [Greek: Ouch ho poiaetaes ton holon estai Theos ho to Mosei eipon auton einai Theon Abraam, kai Theon Isaak, kai Theon Iakob].--Justin Mart. Dial. p. 180. The meaning is, that that divine Person, who called himself God, and was God, was not the Person of the Father, whose ordinary character is that of maker of all things, but another divine Person, namely, God the Son. * * It was Justin's business to shew that there was a divine Person, one who was God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and was not the Father; and therefore there were two divine Persons. At all events, it was a very incautious expre
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170  
171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

divine

 

Person

 

Father

 

Justin

 

passage

 

Fathers

 

reasons

 

Christian

 
denied
 

formula


changing
 

distinction

 

Supremum

 
Tetractys
 

greater

 
admits
 
interpretation
 

Christ

 

literal

 

rendering


reality

 

Waterland

 
distinctively
 

entitatis

 
taking
 

notion

 

exposition

 

things

 
business
 

character


ordinary

 

meaning

 

called

 

Abraham

 

events

 

incautious

 

Persons

 

inconveniences

 
subjected
 
Ipseity

merging

 

Prothesis

 

Thesis

 

Identity

 

poiaetaes

 

Abraam

 

Churches

 

foremost

 

Trinitarianism

 

England