FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99  
100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   >>  
s. It has always stood against the fraudulent promotions; it has always stood against fraudulent nursery stock; it has always stood against fraudulent representations, and I think, for that reason, that its future is reasonably safe, assuming that is its continued policy. THE PRESIDENT: Do you accept Dr. Ulman's amendment? MR. LITTLEPAGE: I accept it. MR. JONES: As I understand the resolution, it applies to nurseries in the infected areas. MR. LITTLEPAGE: Yes. MR. JONES: I believe it is practically impossible to grow trees in an infected area without sending out the blight, but if a man is isolated, like Mr. Riehl, at Alton, Illinois, he can grow trees without danger of sending out the blight. THE PRESIDENT: Well, the resolution permits him to do that. MR. M. P. REED: Did I understand Mr. Kellerman to say the Department hasn't authority to quarantine against such things? THE PRESIDENT: No. The point brought up was the theory that lay back of the quarantine. The speaker made the point that shipment of infected trees was killing the tree aspirations of the people who ought to be developing the nut industry. Every time a man buys a chestnut tree and it dies with blight that man is chilled out of business. Now this resolution doesn't cover that man. It is based on the ground of injury to the industry. You can't very well define the limits of where the blight is not, but it can be fairly well defined as to where it is, and that is up to the Department. MR. LITTLEPAGE: The resolutions are offered in a suggestive way, Mr. President. If the Secretary wants to turn the suggestion down, we will meet again next year any way. PROF. CLOSE: I would like some information as to how you propose to take this matter up with the Department. I was present a year or so ago at a hearing before the Federal Horticultural Board--I don't know whether any one else present was there at the time--but the whole thing hinged largely on Colonel Sober's attitude in propagating and sending out the Paragon chestnut, and I think the Department--the Federal Horticultural Board--originated the question that you are discussing now, and Colonel Sober came there with a whole lot of pretty good information, and people to back up what he said, and the Department put up a mighty poor show, I tell you. I was ashamed of what the Department men had to say, and Colonel Sober won out hands down. Now, if this question comes up again, it will be re
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99  
100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   >>  



Top keywords:

Department

 

blight

 

LITTLEPAGE

 
infected
 
resolution
 

Colonel

 

sending

 

PRESIDENT

 
fraudulent
 

industry


chestnut
 

present

 

information

 

quarantine

 

Horticultural

 

Federal

 

people

 

accept

 
question
 

understand


resolutions

 

suggestive

 

offered

 

President

 

suggestion

 

propose

 

Secretary

 

mighty

 

attitude

 

ashamed


propagating

 

Paragon

 
originated
 

discussing

 

largely

 

pretty

 

hearing

 
matter
 
hinged
 

aspirations


isolated

 
impossible
 

practically

 

permits

 
Illinois
 
danger
 

nurseries

 

applies

 

reason

 

future