FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377  
378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   >>  
wonderful camp yours must be! What would you have done if I had sent you to Tarentum[699] instead of Samobriva? I was already a little doubtful about you, when I found you supporting the same doctrine as my friend Selius![700] But on what ground will you support the principles of civil law, if you act always in your own interest and not in that of your fellow citizens? What, too, is to become of the legal formula in cases of trust, "as should be done among honest men"? For who can be called honest who does nothing except on his own behalf? What principle will you lay down "in dividing a common property," when nothing can be "common" among men who measure all things by their own pleasure?[701] How, again, can you ever think it right to swear by _Iupiter lapis_, when you know that Iupiter cannot be angry with anyone?[702] What is to become of the people of Ulubrae,[703] if you have decided that it is not right to take part in civic business? Wherefore, if you are really and truly a pervert from our faith, I am much annoyed; but if you merely find it convenient to humour Pansa, I forgive you. Only _do_ write and tell us how you are, and what you want me to do or to look after for you. [Footnote 698: C. Vibius Pansa had been in Gaul, and was now home to stand for the tribuneship, which he obtained for B.C. 52-51.] [Footnote 699: Where he would have been in luxury.] [Footnote 700: A follower of the new academy, with which Cicero was more in sympathy than with the Epicurean ethics, but apparently only partly so. The leading doctrine was the denial of the possibility of knowledge, and, applied to ethics, this might destroy all virtue.] [Footnote 701: All these jesting objections to a lawyer being an Epicurean are founded on the Epicurean doctrine that individual feeling is the standard of morals, and the _summum bonum_ is the good of the individual. The logical deduction that a man should therefore hold aloof from politics and social life, as involving social obligations and standards, was, of course, evaded in practice.] [Footnote 702: For the Epicureans believed the gods to exist, but not to trouble themselves with the affairs of men. In taking an oath by _Iupiter lapis_ the swearer took a stone in his hand and said, "If I abide by this oath may he bless me: but if I do otherwise in thought or deed, may all others be kept safe, each in his own country, under his own laws, in enjoyment of his own goods, household god
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377  
378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   >>  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

Epicurean

 

Iupiter

 

doctrine

 

honest

 

common

 

ethics

 

social

 

individual

 

denial


knowledge
 

possibility

 
applied
 

lawyer

 

jesting

 

destroy

 

objections

 

virtue

 

follower

 

luxury


obtained

 
academy
 

Cicero

 

partly

 
apparently
 

sympathy

 

country

 
leading
 

summum

 

trouble


household

 

practice

 

Epicureans

 

believed

 

enjoyment

 

affairs

 

taking

 

swearer

 

thought

 
evaded

logical

 
deduction
 
feeling
 

standard

 

morals

 

obligations

 

standards

 

involving

 

politics

 

founded