FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359  
360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   >>   >|  
[lambda]^2f^2 |_ _/_/ f _| _ _ _ _ 1 | / / x[xi] + y[eta] |^2 + ------------- | | | cos k -------------- dxdy | (2). [lambda]^2f^2 |_ _/_/ f _| This expression for the intensity becomes rigorously applicable when f is indefinitely great, so that ordinary optical aberration disappears. The incident waves are thus plane, and are limited to a plane aperture coincident with a wave-front. The integrals are then properly functions of the _direction_ in which the light is to be estimated. In experiment under ordinary circumstances it makes no difference whether the collecting lens is in front of or behind the diffracting aperture. It is usually most convenient to employ a telescope focused upon the radiant point, and to place the diffracting apertures immediately in front of the object-glass. What is seen through the eye-piece in any case is the same as would be depicted upon a screen in the focal plane. Before proceeding to special cases it may be well to call attention to some general properties of the solution expressed by (2) (see Bridge, _Phil. Mag._, 1858). If when the aperture is given, the wave-length (proportional to k^-1) varies, the composition of the integrals is unaltered, provided [xi] and [eta] are taken universely proportional to [lambda]. A diminution of [lambda] thus leads to a simple proportional shrinkage of the diffraction pattern, attended by an augmentation of brilliancy in proportion to [lambda]^-2. If the wave-length remains unchanged, similar effects are produced by an increase in the scale of the aperture. The linear dimension of the diffraction pattern is inversely as that of the aperture, and the brightness at corresponding points is as the _square_ of the area of aperture. If the aperture and wave-length increase in the same proportion, the size and shape of the diffraction pattern undergo no change. We will now apply the integrals (2) to the case of a rectangular aperture of width a parallel to x and of width b parallel to y. The limits of integration for x may thus be taken to be -1/2a and +1/2a, and for y to be -1/2b, +1/2b. We readily find (with substitution for k of 2[pi]/[lambda]) [pi]a[xi] [pi]b[eta]
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359  
360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

aperture

 

lambda

 

proportional

 

length

 
integrals
 
pattern
 

diffraction

 

diffracting

 

increase

 

proportion


ordinary

 

parallel

 

diminution

 

simple

 

properties

 

solution

 

expressed

 
shrinkage
 

provided

 

Bridge


unaltered
 
composition
 

varies

 

universely

 

brightness

 

change

 

undergo

 
substitution
 

readily

 

integration


rectangular

 
limits
 

square

 
general
 

similar

 

effects

 
unchanged
 
remains
 

augmentation

 

brilliancy


produced

 

points

 

inversely

 

linear

 

dimension

 

attended

 
direction
 

functions

 
properly
 

coincident