FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171  
172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   >>   >|  
and freely, quite regardless of, and not caring one jot for, those whose friendship I lost in consequence--no, not even as in this case, where the very artists who confessed to me, and who appealed to me to attack the Academy, subsequently avoided me, as "it wouldn't do, don't you know, to be seen with Furniss, as I am in the running for the Academy." This was my dedication. [Illustration: THE SEE-SAW ANTIC.] The one object in view was to disabuse the public mind of the erroneous impression that the Royal Academy is an unprejudiced official public body, that they elect only the best artists, and reject only the unworthy--in fact, that R.A. should be considered a hall-mark on work, as too many believe it to be, to the detriment of the majority of artists. "Most of those artists who write and talk of art may be considered prejudiced--no one can well say that you are. What is the Royal Academy to you?" was said to me. I was even encouraged by some of the Academicians themselves, who had from time to time fruitlessly attempted to introduce reforms; but notwithstanding the efforts of the right-minded members of their body, the majority adopt the Fabian policy of sitting down and doing nothing, or bury their heads, ostrich-like, till the storm of indignation raised by their unworthy selfishness and indolence has blown over. I went thoroughly into the subject. I read Blue-books, criticisms, sober, solid reviews, Royal Academicians' confessions and defence. I read everything connected with the history of the Royal Academy from beginning to end. Then I appeared on the platform and gave lectures on Art and Artists and the Royal Academy, which drew forth leading articles from the _Times_ and nearly every paper in the land. In my researches I found that the Royal Academy has been a narrow-minded clique from its very initiation. It was procured by the trickery of an American (its first President), West, from that "dull lad brought up by narrow-minded people," George the Third, described by Thackeray: "Like all dull men, the King was all his life suspicious of superior people. He did not like ... Reynolds.... He loved mediocrities--Benjamin West was his favourite painter." "A royal patron on the sly secured, Which from the first its cheek to shame inured."[A] [Footnote A: Soden's "Rap at the R.A."] It was a contemptible pandering to unblushing and self-interested sycophancy, involving practically the ruin of all t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171  
172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Academy

 

artists

 

minded

 

unworthy

 
narrow
 

public

 

people

 
Academicians
 

majority

 
considered

articles

 
researches
 

appeared

 

reviews

 
confessions
 

defence

 

criticisms

 

subject

 

connected

 

Artists


lectures

 

beginning

 

history

 
platform
 

leading

 

inured

 
Footnote
 

secured

 

painter

 

patron


sycophancy

 

involving

 

practically

 

interested

 
contemptible
 

pandering

 
unblushing
 

favourite

 

Benjamin

 
brought

George

 

President

 
initiation
 

procured

 
trickery
 

American

 
Thackeray
 
Reynolds
 

mediocrities

 
superior