tralization
proceeds _inversely_ as the squares of the distances. In other words, we
have reached the conclusion that, on the hypothesis that matter was
originally irradiated from a centre and is now returning to it, the
concentralization, in the return, proceeds _exactly as we know the force
of gravitation to proceed_.
Now here, if we could be permitted to assume that concentralization
exactly represented the _force of the tendency to the centre_--that the
one was exactly proportional to the other, and that the two proceeded
together--we should have shown all that is required. The sole difficulty
existing, then, is to establish a direct proportion between
"concentralization" and the _force_ of concentralization; and this is
done, of course, if we establish such proportion between "irradiation"
and the _force_ of irradiation.
A very slight inspection of the Heavens assures us that the stars have a
certain general uniformity, equability, or equidistance, of distribution
through that region of space in which, collectively, and in a roughly
globular form, they are situated:--this species of very general, rather
than absolute, equability, being in full keeping with my deduction of
inequidistance, within certain limits, among the originally diffused
atoms, as a corollary from the evident design of infinite complexity of
relation out of irrelation. I started, it will be remembered, with the
idea of a generally uniform but particularly _un_uniform distribution of
the atoms;--an idea, I repeat, which an inspection of the stars, as they
exist, confirms.
But even in the merely general equability of distribution, as regards
the atoms, there appears a difficulty which, no doubt, has already
suggested itself to those among my readers who have borne in mind that I
suppose this equability of distribution effected through _irradiation
from a centre_. The very first glance at the idea, irradiation, forces
us to the entertainment of the hitherto unseparated and seemingly
inseparable idea of agglomeration about a centre, with dispersion as we
recede from it--the idea, in a word, of _in_equability of distribution in
respect to the matter irradiated.
Now, I have elsewhere[1] observed that it is by just such difficulties
as the one now in question--such roughnesses--such peculiarities--such
protuberances above the plane of the ordinary--that Reason feels her way,
if at all, in her search for the True. By the difficulty--the
"peculia
|